<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Use Layer 3 Switch to replace service provider Router? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/use-layer-3-switch-to-replace-service-provider-router/m-p/3754306#M1049236</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Last time I checked, the only multi-layer switch which did NAT was the 6500.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;NAT is certainly not supported on the access-layer switches you mention. You will need to look at introducing an ISR/ ASA to your topology.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:36:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Seb Rupik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-28T12:36:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Use Layer 3 Switch to replace service provider Router?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/use-layer-3-switch-to-replace-service-provider-router/m-p/3754250#M1049197</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I want to replace my service provider Zyxel router with something more manageable. I have 2960 and 3650 switches I can use as layer 3 switches. My concern is the security when implementing a layer 3 switch over the stock router with integrated firewall.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What should I do regarding ports? I don't want outsiders to access open ports inside my network. What I know I have to do:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- NAT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Access-list&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Routing&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- DHCP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So my question is what else do I forget when I want to have a secure layer 3 switch as my router? Thanks for the help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/use-layer-3-switch-to-replace-service-provider-router/m-p/3754250#M1049197</guid>
      <dc:creator>puttybear</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T16:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use Layer 3 Switch to replace service provider Router?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/use-layer-3-switch-to-replace-service-provider-router/m-p/3754272#M1049205</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Stop where you are.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The NAT function is not on those switches. You are better off replacing the Zyxel router with a small ISR (880 series) or an ASA.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/use-layer-3-switch-to-replace-service-provider-router/m-p/3754272#M1049205</guid>
      <dc:creator>Seb Rupik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-28T11:48:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use Layer 3 Switch to replace service provider Router?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/use-layer-3-switch-to-replace-service-provider-router/m-p/3754283#M1049220</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ohh what.. Thanks for the heads up lol! I was sure NAT worked with layer 3 switches. I can get all the different IOS available from cisco download center If there are any addons to support NAT? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:05:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/use-layer-3-switch-to-replace-service-provider-router/m-p/3754283#M1049220</guid>
      <dc:creator>puttybear</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-28T12:05:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use Layer 3 Switch to replace service provider Router?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/use-layer-3-switch-to-replace-service-provider-router/m-p/3754306#M1049236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Last time I checked, the only multi-layer switch which did NAT was the 6500.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;NAT is certainly not supported on the access-layer switches you mention. You will need to look at introducing an ISR/ ASA to your topology.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:36:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/use-layer-3-switch-to-replace-service-provider-router/m-p/3754306#M1049236</guid>
      <dc:creator>Seb Rupik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-28T12:36:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

