<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Unable to ping remote subnet after tunnel is established in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779145#M1054100</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The config file is attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 01:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kltconsulting</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-09T01:19:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unable to ping remote subnet after tunnel is established</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779143#M1054094</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am connecting a Cisco ASA 5505 and a Symantec Gateway 460R device via site to site VPN tunnel, and the Phase 1 (IKE) and Phase 2 (IPSec) negotiations go thru just fine. I show 1 active IKE and 1 active ipsec on the monitoring screen. However, when I try to ping a device on the remote subnet, the pings time-out. I can ping the public IP of the outside interface on the peer device, but if I try to ping anything on the inside interface, I get a time-out. If the tunnel is established, shouldn't my subnet be able to communicate with the remote subnet?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:30:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779143#M1054094</guid>
      <dc:creator>kltconsulting</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T09:30:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to ping remote subnet after tunnel is established</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779144#M1054095</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A little more info may be needed here. ASA config would be nice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 23:17:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779144#M1054095</guid>
      <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-08T23:17:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to ping remote subnet after tunnel is established</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779145#M1054100</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The config file is attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 01:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779145#M1054100</guid>
      <dc:creator>kltconsulting</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-09T01:19:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to ping remote subnet after tunnel is established</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779146#M1054101</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having the same problem between an ASA and an 871w.  The tunnel is up.  However, on the ASA, if I do a "debug icmp trace", and then ping from a device on the remote end to the ASA inside interface, I see the icmp echo requests come in to the inside interface, but the ASA echo replies go back out the outside interface.  It's as though traffic is not routing to the remote properly through the tunnel.  I've checked the no-nat access-list - looks ok to me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779146#M1054101</guid>
      <dc:creator>james.rugh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-21T21:37:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to ping remote subnet after tunnel is established</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779147#M1054102</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Without knowing a litle more about how each end of the network is set up, it might be a little hard to narrow this down with just the config file.  If you do a tracert, does that completely fail?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The next 2 issues to look at would be 1-Are there any ACLs, or the like, on either end that is blocking ICMP Ping traffic? and 2-Does the host that you are pinging on the other end know where to send the response? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may need to add a static route to the host on the other end to make sure that it knows which interface or IP on the network to send the response back out through.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Be aware, that if you add a static route to a Windows Server or Workstation, it will stay in there only as long as the computer has not been rebooted.  I haven't found a way to keep it in there permanently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reido&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779147#M1054102</guid>
      <dc:creator>reido2131</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-26T21:01:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to ping remote subnet after tunnel is established</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779148#M1054103</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can add a "permanent" route to a MS-Windows system by using the "-p" flag on the ROUTE ADD command.   Here's a screen cut-and-paste from the help shown when you just give the ROUTE command without any argument:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"  -p           When used with the ADD command, makes a route persistent across&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;               boots of the system. By default, routes are not preserved&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;               when the system is restarted. Ignored for all other commands,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;               which always affect the appropriate persistent routes. This&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;               option is not supported in Windows 95."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/unable-to-ping-remote-subnet-after-tunnel-is-established/m-p/779148#M1054103</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomasdzubin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-28T14:21:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

