<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Ciscoworks baselines and crypto maps in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ciscoworks-baselines-and-crypto-maps/m-p/552679#M1055032</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to match crypto maps as a submode so I can verify qos pre-classify is applied. The crypto map names and numbers vary, but will always be ipsec-isakmp.  So far, I have tried the following to match the map:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map [#.* .*#] ipsec-isakmp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map [#.* .* .*#]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map [#.* .* ipsec-isakmp#]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried other variations without any success.  I also noticed that when CiscoWorks has a "processed config" with many peers under one crypto map, it displays them all as one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone had success matching crypto maps to input subcommands?  If so, what did you use to match?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pehowell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:59:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ciscoworks baselines and crypto maps</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ciscoworks-baselines-and-crypto-maps/m-p/552679#M1055032</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to match crypto maps as a submode so I can verify qos pre-classify is applied. The crypto map names and numbers vary, but will always be ipsec-isakmp.  So far, I have tried the following to match the map:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map [#.* .*#] ipsec-isakmp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map [#.* .* .*#]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map [#.* .* ipsec-isakmp#]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried other variations without any success.  I also noticed that when CiscoWorks has a "processed config" with many peers under one crypto map, it displays them all as one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone had success matching crypto maps to input subcommands?  If so, what did you use to match?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ciscoworks-baselines-and-crypto-maps/m-p/552679#M1055032</guid>
      <dc:creator>pehowell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:59:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ciscoworks baselines and crypto maps</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ciscoworks-baselines-and-crypto-maps/m-p/552680#M1055034</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you ever find a solution to this problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Im trying to check compliance under crypto   "ipsec client ezvpn xxxxx".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No matter what I use for CLI commands , It is always compliant. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:54:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ciscoworks-baselines-and-crypto-maps/m-p/552680#M1055034</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdecout</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-26T20:54:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

