<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LMS and RTM in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lms-and-rtm/m-p/412235#M1057069</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what I know about RTM (from Networkers about 2 yrs ago), it'd best to have it on its own server. It's just a total pig on memory usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:05:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-09-29T18:05:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LMS and RTM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lms-and-rtm/m-p/412233#M1057027</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know RTM is EOL, but will LMS 2.5 and RTM 1.4 play nice on the same Platform?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:24:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lms-and-rtm/m-p/412233#M1057027</guid>
      <dc:creator>richard.whitlock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:24:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LMS and RTM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lms-and-rtm/m-p/412234#M1057048</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assuming you have a ton of memory, they should be ok to run on the same server together&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 00:27:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lms-and-rtm/m-p/412234#M1057048</guid>
      <dc:creator>nhabib</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-21T00:27:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LMS and RTM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lms-and-rtm/m-p/412235#M1057069</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what I know about RTM (from Networkers about 2 yrs ago), it'd best to have it on its own server. It's just a total pig on memory usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:05:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lms-and-rtm/m-p/412235#M1057069</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-29T18:05:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

