<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: cell mode TE in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cell-mode-te/m-p/73191#M1061715</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Kostas, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;unfortunately TE in cell mode mpls will never be able to operate like in frame mode. The reason is, that in frame mode you can have a stack of forwarding labels, one being the label for the TE tunnel, the second being the "normal" forwarding label. Obviously there is no address space for two labels in an ATM cell. So there is only one forwarding label and that means no traffic engineering in cell mode. The only possibility I know about would be to fully mesh the LERs with PVPs and then run MPLS through the PVPs like in a non-MPLS core. However this is not scaling well and creates more problems than it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:42:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mheusinger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-02-18T15:42:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>cell mode TE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cell-mode-te/m-p/73189#M1061713</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Does traffic engineering in cell mode mpls (BPX-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; LSC  network) work.If not why?Is it a problem with &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; RSVP on atm vc's.Will it be supported in the future?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kostas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:50:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cell-mode-te/m-p/73189#M1061713</guid>
      <dc:creator>k.anagnopoulos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:50:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cell mode TE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cell-mode-te/m-p/73190#M1061714</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It&amp;#146;s too complex to determine without looking at your exact situation.  Start here:&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120limit/120st/120st14/scalable.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120limit/120st/120st14/scalable.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t2/te_mib12.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t2/te_mib12.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120limit/120st/120st14/lspbgone.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120limit/120st/120st14/lspbgone.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 22:43:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cell-mode-te/m-p/73190#M1061714</guid>
      <dc:creator>s-doyle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-10-04T22:43:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cell mode TE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cell-mode-te/m-p/73191#M1061715</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Kostas, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;unfortunately TE in cell mode mpls will never be able to operate like in frame mode. The reason is, that in frame mode you can have a stack of forwarding labels, one being the label for the TE tunnel, the second being the "normal" forwarding label. Obviously there is no address space for two labels in an ATM cell. So there is only one forwarding label and that means no traffic engineering in cell mode. The only possibility I know about would be to fully mesh the LERs with PVPs and then run MPLS through the PVPs like in a non-MPLS core. However this is not scaling well and creates more problems than it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:42:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cell-mode-te/m-p/73191#M1061715</guid>
      <dc:creator>mheusinger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-18T15:42:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

