<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: queing vs load balancing in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/queing-vs-load-balancing/m-p/20567#M1062961</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Load balancing comes before queueing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:23:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>r-simpson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-09-20T18:23:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>queing vs load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/queing-vs-load-balancing/m-p/20566#M1062959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which is the first thing of queueing and load balancing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I've experienced load unbalance in 2*512K serial interfaces which are configured as load sharing per packet and cbwfq. If load balancing is after the queueing, load must be equally shared.  &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/queing-vs-load-balancing/m-p/20566#M1062959</guid>
      <dc:creator>b.roh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: queing vs load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/queing-vs-load-balancing/m-p/20567#M1062961</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Load balancing comes before queueing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:23:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/queing-vs-load-balancing/m-p/20567#M1062961</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-simpson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-20T18:23:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: queing vs load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/queing-vs-load-balancing/m-p/20568#M1062963</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Plz be clear about load balancing and queueing. Load balancing occurs when you have multiple links to the same site whereas **Queueing is triggered** only when the packet input rate is higher than the packet output rate. This happens if your processor is overloaded and there is very less memory to handle incoming packets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Queueing different classes of traffic under CBWFQ is *NOT* load balancing. Your outbound traffic from both the routers simply depends on how much and what type of traffic was inbound to each of the routers. Hence a lot depends on how you have configured load balancing and the CBWFQ classes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if you need more info.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naveen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="mailto:mnaveen@cisco.com"&gt;mnaveen@cisco.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2003 05:17:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/queing-vs-load-balancing/m-p/20568#M1062963</guid>
      <dc:creator>mnaveen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-22T05:17:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

