<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA secondary - failed in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-secondary-failed/m-p/3317499#M1064530</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My secondary ASA shows failed in the output of show failover because of a down interface. I was wondering will the failover work automatically if the active fails or failover will not work because the secondary is in a failed state&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ziad El Achkouty</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:12:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA secondary - failed</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-secondary-failed/m-p/3317499#M1064530</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My secondary ASA shows failed in the output of show failover because of a down interface. I was wondering will the failover work automatically if the active fails or failover will not work because the secondary is in a failed state&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-secondary-failed/m-p/3317499#M1064530</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ziad El Achkouty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:12:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA secondary - failed</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-secondary-failed/m-p/3317511#M1064532</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the secondary shows as failed then I would expect failover not to work. If there is a down interface on the secondary can you do something to bring it up? Or can you remove that interface from monitoring?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-secondary-failed/m-p/3317511#M1064532</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Burts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-24T09:20:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA secondary - failed</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-secondary-failed/m-p/3317513#M1064534</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The failover will not work if the other host is in a failed state. For the failover to work you need to have the other host in standby ready mode.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also if the interface is not monitored it should not influence the state. To monitor an interface following command can be used:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;monitor-interface &amp;lt;interface-name&amp;gt; .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bogdan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:22:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-secondary-failed/m-p/3317513#M1064534</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bogdan Nita</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-24T09:22:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

