<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CSCvd78303 - affected versions in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscvd78303-affected-versions/m-p/3185553#M1066031</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a customer who are running Cisco ASA version 9.6.2 software. When I look at the afftected software versions for Cisco bug ID&amp;nbsp;CSCvd78303, the 9.6.2 code train starts with version 9.6.2(1). Does this mean that version 9.6.2 is not affected?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James Strong</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T14:19:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSCvd78303 - affected versions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscvd78303-affected-versions/m-p/3185553#M1066031</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a customer who are running Cisco ASA version 9.6.2 software. When I look at the afftected software versions for Cisco bug ID&amp;nbsp;CSCvd78303, the 9.6.2 code train starts with version 9.6.2(1). Does this mean that version 9.6.2 is not affected?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscvd78303-affected-versions/m-p/3185553#M1066031</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Strong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T14:19:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSCvd78303 - affected versions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscvd78303-affected-versions/m-p/3186011#M1066034</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is an exact version your customer is running? According to documentation, yes, 9.6(2.1) is the first version affected, but... Well, I wouldn't like to test it out, plus there a bunch of bugs fixed since 9.6(2), so, in my opinion, going for the latest 9.6(3) would save you a lot of headache in the future.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscvd78303-affected-versions/m-p/3186011#M1066034</guid>
      <dc:creator>niko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-19T12:26:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSCvd78303 - affected versions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscvd78303-affected-versions/m-p/3368098#M1066037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi James,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;that problem affect&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;ASA releases 9.6(2)1 and higher, including 9.6(3), so I understand that 9.6.2 is not affacted by this bug.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscvd78303-affected-versions/m-p/3368098#M1066037</guid>
      <dc:creator>andre.ortega</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-18T12:47:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

