<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: interface level asa failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4036244#M1067022</link>
    <description>There is no impact when adding the secondary IP address.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-26T15:18:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>interface level asa failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4031472#M161403</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Need to know is it mandatory to have an secondary ip addresss to an interface whose need to monitor in Active-Standby Asa failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Attaching my failover and interface configuration for your reference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Device - Asa 5555-x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failover On&lt;BR /&gt;Failover unit Primary&lt;BR /&gt;Failover LAN Interface: Failover GigabitEthernet0/7 (up)&lt;BR /&gt;Reconnect timeout 0:00:00&lt;BR /&gt;Unit Poll frequency 1 seconds, holdtime 15 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;Interface Poll frequency 5 seconds, holdtime 25 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;Interface Policy 1&lt;BR /&gt;Monitored Interfaces 5 of 516 maximum&lt;BR /&gt;MAC Address Move Notification Interval not set&lt;BR /&gt;Version: Ours 9.8(2), Mate 9.8(2)&lt;BR /&gt;Serial Number: Ours xxxxxxxxxx, Mate Unknown.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;no nameif&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;no security-level&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;no ip address&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/3.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;vlan 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;nameif user1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.128&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;policy-route route-map PBR_NEW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/3.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;vlan 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;nameif user2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 192.168.1.129 255.255.255.128&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/3.3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;vlan 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;nameif user3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 172.31.1.1 255.255.254.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4031472#M161403</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishal77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T17:55:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: interface level asa failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4031880#M314288</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is not mandatory to have a secondary IP address on the interface.&amp;nbsp; If you do not have a secondary IP address on the interface the secondary ASA is not able to monitor the health of the primary ASA over that interface and therefore can only rely on the failover link for the primary ASA health.&amp;nbsp; This means that if there is an issue with the cable on the primary ASA interface no failover will occur as the secondary ASA sees the primary ASA as up over the failover link.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 23:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4031880#M314288</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-18T23:09:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: interface level asa failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4035928#M1066996</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4035928#M1066996</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishal77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-26T07:56:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: interface level asa failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4036191#M1067020</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Marius,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I add secondary IP address to my interface (which was not previously) for my secondary ASA able to monitor the health of the primary ASA over that interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then would I need downtime for same&amp;nbsp; as I need to do configuration changes&amp;nbsp; on Active Asa or else it would no impact ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4036191#M1067020</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishal77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-26T14:25:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: interface level asa failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4036244#M1067022</link>
      <description>There is no impact when adding the secondary IP address.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4036244#M1067022</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-26T15:18:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: interface level asa failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4036599#M1067046</link>
      <description>Thanks Marius</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 03:49:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-level-asa-failover/m-p/4036599#M1067046</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishal77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-27T03:49:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

