<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Firepower 1140 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-1140/m-p/4037828#M1067143</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Experts, I would like to know whether new 1140 supports Etherchannels for Redundant interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 00:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arshad Safrulla</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-29T00:52:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firepower 1140</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-1140/m-p/4037828#M1067143</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Experts, I would like to know whether new 1140 supports Etherchannels for Redundant interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 00:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-1140/m-p/4037828#M1067143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arshad Safrulla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T00:52:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower 1140</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-1140/m-p/4037882#M1067150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not 100% positive but I believe redundant interfaces must be physical type - not logical (i.e. they CANNOT also be Etherchannels). This constraint applies to all Firepower hardware appliance models.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 04:35:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-1140/m-p/4037882#M1067150</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T04:35:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower 1140</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-1140/m-p/4037934#M1067157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks. but do they support port-channels only?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-1140/m-p/4037934#M1067157</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arshad Safrulla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T10:26:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower 1140</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-1140/m-p/4037940#M1067158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;An 1140 can have Etherchannel / portchannel interfaces. It can also have redundant interfaces.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It cannot have an Etherchannel that is also a redundant interface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-1140/m-p/4037940#M1067158</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T11:08:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

