<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA 5506X replacements with FPR1010 adding to FMC in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5506x-replacements-with-fpr1010-adding-to-fmc/m-p/4060044#M1068871</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's what I was hoping.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lee Dress</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-06T15:37:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 5506X replacements with FPR1010 adding to FMC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5506x-replacements-with-fpr1010-adding-to-fmc/m-p/4059978#M1068858</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are in the process of replacing our remote ASA 5506X devices with the new FPR1010 devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our FMC at the main office manages all of these devices with classic licenses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know the new FPR 1010 devices require a smart license.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any issue running in a "hybrid" type mode where some devices have classic licenses, and some licenses are smart?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been able to create a VPN Site to Site connection between the main 5516x and the new unit.&amp;nbsp; I just want to manage the policies that are applied to the new device via FMC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Topology Overview:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Main Site and DR Site: ASA 5516X w/Firepower attached to FMC with Classic Licenses (not being replaced)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remote Large offices: ASA 5508X w/Firepower attached to FMC with Classic Licenses (not being replaced)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all other remote offices: ASA 5506X w/Firepower attached to FMC with Classic Licenses (these are being replaced with the new FPR1010 devices.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lee&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 14:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5506x-replacements-with-fpr1010-adding-to-fmc/m-p/4059978#M1068858</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lee Dress</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T14:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA 5506X replacements with FPR1010 adding to FMC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5506x-replacements-with-fpr1010-adding-to-fmc/m-p/4060031#M1068867</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A given FMC can manage both types of devices.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've done that with a mix of Legacy Sourcefire 3D series (PAK licensed) and FTD (smart licensed) since 6.0 or 6.1.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:29:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5506x-replacements-with-fpr1010-adding-to-fmc/m-p/4060031#M1068867</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T15:29:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA 5506X replacements with FPR1010 adding to FMC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5506x-replacements-with-fpr1010-adding-to-fmc/m-p/4060044#M1068871</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's what I was hoping.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5506x-replacements-with-fpr1010-adding-to-fmc/m-p/4060044#M1068871</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lee Dress</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T15:37:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

