<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco Firepower - Web Servers Policy in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-web-servers-policy/m-p/4075418#M1069561</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're looking to make a change to the intrusion policy setup we use on a deployment, currently we have a single 'master' intrusion policy that we apply to all of our access policy rules. What we're looking to do is have a separate policy just for our web servers that'll only use the rule signatures relevant to the traffic (HTTP/S.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I made a new intrusion policy and used the base policy 'No Rules Active' and then filtered on rules which use the destination port 80/443 and set them to drop and generate events (Aside from the malware CNC.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've got a couple of questions just regarding the way I've done this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Will I run into issues with preprocessors, should I change their state from disabled (Only HTTP/S?)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is there a better way of working?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apologies if this is vague, I've not got a lot of experience with Firepower; any help would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>STCG</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-28T08:17:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco Firepower - Web Servers Policy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-web-servers-policy/m-p/4075418#M1069561</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're looking to make a change to the intrusion policy setup we use on a deployment, currently we have a single 'master' intrusion policy that we apply to all of our access policy rules. What we're looking to do is have a separate policy just for our web servers that'll only use the rule signatures relevant to the traffic (HTTP/S.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I made a new intrusion policy and used the base policy 'No Rules Active' and then filtered on rules which use the destination port 80/443 and set them to drop and generate events (Aside from the malware CNC.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've got a couple of questions just regarding the way I've done this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Will I run into issues with preprocessors, should I change their state from disabled (Only HTTP/S?)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is there a better way of working?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apologies if this is vague, I've not got a lot of experience with Firepower; any help would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-web-servers-policy/m-p/4075418#M1069561</guid>
      <dc:creator>STCG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-28T08:17:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

