<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Firepower in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower/m-p/4089333#M1070378</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;Yes that makes sense, you need the appropriate routes defined on the firewall and core switch. What exactly is your issue?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 13:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-20T13:55:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firepower</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower/m-p/4089325#M1070377</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good day all&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a One Core Switch SG550X 28P-10G with DHCP Server enabled for my Vlans 4 Vlans and 3 Distribution Switches (Collapsed Core Environment) SG300X series and 5 Ruckus 510 APS mapped with the VLANs&amp;nbsp; with 2 ISP Links&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I now want to incorporate the Firewall 2100 as the breakout router that being said I have created a static route to my core on the Firewall, and also created a static route on the Core to the Firepower&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please advice if the above makes sense&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 13:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower/m-p/4089325#M1070377</guid>
      <dc:creator>DivineMuteta90931</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-20T13:47:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower/m-p/4089333#M1070378</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;Yes that makes sense, you need the appropriate routes defined on the firewall and core switch. What exactly is your issue?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 13:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower/m-p/4089333#M1070378</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-20T13:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

