<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Difference between PAP vs CHAP for RADIUS authentication in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pap-vs-chap-for-radius-authentication/m-p/4093081#M1070518</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I also realize that the ASA and NPS use the shared secret key to encrypt communication between the two but what am I missing. What drawback should I be considering for not using PAP in this instance?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 21:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>zrunner626</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-27T21:05:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Difference between PAP vs CHAP for RADIUS authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pap-vs-chap-for-radius-authentication/m-p/4092846#M1070511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can anyone describe how PAP works between ASA and Microsoft NPS for RADIUS authentication and how MS-CHAP is different?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please don't tell me that PAP sends the password in clear text. I have taken PCAPs and I see no clear text shared secret or passwords being transmitted between the ASA and NPS. I'm trying to understand the risk if I choose to allow PAP so that we can use all Azure MFA options including one-way text message, OATH hardware tokens and mobile app verification code.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 14:23:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pap-vs-chap-for-radius-authentication/m-p/4092846#M1070511</guid>
      <dc:creator>zrunner626</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-27T14:23:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Difference between PAP vs CHAP for RADIUS authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pap-vs-chap-for-radius-authentication/m-p/4093081#M1070518</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I also realize that the ASA and NPS use the shared secret key to encrypt communication between the two but what am I missing. What drawback should I be considering for not using PAP in this instance?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 21:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pap-vs-chap-for-radius-authentication/m-p/4093081#M1070518</guid>
      <dc:creator>zrunner626</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-27T21:05:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

