<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097925#M1070776</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Devices are in the same room, side by side.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 22:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>angranados@la.logicalis.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-04T22:03:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097770#M1070764</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good day&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a Firewall ASA5500, during the failover test. the system tooks roughly 40sec to converge. Do you know any information about how I can optimize this time?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your support!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:50:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097770#M1070764</guid>
      <dc:creator>angranados@la.logicalis.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T17:50:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097801#M1070765</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you post the output of below command to look on both?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;show failover&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;EDIT :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;check the timers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/conf_gd/failover.html#wp1142481" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/conf_gd/failover.html#wp1142481&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 18:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097801#M1070765</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T18:38:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097815#M1070766</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;EMX-INTERNAL-FW-B/pri/act# show failover&lt;BR /&gt;Failover On&lt;BR /&gt;Last Failover at: 19:51:48 CDT Jun 2 2020&lt;BR /&gt;This context: Active&lt;BR /&gt;Active time: 149989 (sec)&lt;BR /&gt;Interface management (10.10.71.11): Normal (Not-Monitored)&lt;BR /&gt;Interface oob-net01 (10.10.70.51): Link Down (Not-Monitored)&lt;BR /&gt;Peer context: Standby Ready&lt;BR /&gt;Active time: 2268 (sec)&lt;BR /&gt;Interface management (10.10.71.12): Normal (Not-Monitored)&lt;BR /&gt;Interface oob-net01 (10.10.70.52): Normal (Not-Monitored)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stateful Failover Logical Update Statistics&lt;BR /&gt;Status: Configured.&lt;BR /&gt;Stateful Obj xmit xerr rcv rerr&lt;BR /&gt;RPC services 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;TCP conn 445431 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;UDP conn 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;ARP tbl 4259662 0 6964 0&lt;BR /&gt;Xlate_Timeout 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;IPv6 ND tbl 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;VPN IKEv1 SA 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;VPN IKEv1 P2 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;VPN IKEv2 SA 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;VPN IKEv2 P2 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;VPN CTCP upd 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;VPN SDI upd 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;VPN DHCP upd 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;SIP Session 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;SIP Tx 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;SIP Pinhole 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;Route Session 20 0 12 2&lt;BR /&gt;Router ID 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;User-Identity 2 0 1 0&lt;BR /&gt;CTS SGTNAME 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;CTS PAC 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;TrustSec-SXP 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;IPv6 Route 0 0 0 0&lt;BR /&gt;STS Table 0 0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 18:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097815#M1070766</guid>
      <dc:creator>angranados@la.logicalis.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T18:51:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097835#M1070768</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Failover is normally smooth. one or two ping packet loss occurs. what is configured in between two units. if its a switch check the spanning tree convergence. could be some thing not right at layers 2. also looking into your output one of the interface is in down state. and non of the link are in monitor mode.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;EMX-INTERNAL-FW-B/pri/act# show failover&lt;BR /&gt;Failover On&lt;BR /&gt;Last Failover at: 19:51:48 CDT Jun 2 2020&lt;BR /&gt;This context: Active&lt;BR /&gt;Active time: 149989 (sec)&lt;BR /&gt;Interface management (10.10.71.11): Normal (Not-Monitored)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Interface oob-net01 (10.10.70.51): Link Down (Not-Monitored)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Peer context: Standby Ready&lt;BR /&gt;Active time: 2268 (sec)&lt;BR /&gt;Interface management (10.10.71.12): Normal (Not-Monitored)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Interface oob-net01 (10.10.70.52): Normal (Not-Monitored)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 19:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097835#M1070768</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T19:22:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097853#M1070770</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 19:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097853#M1070770</guid>
      <dc:creator>angranados@la.logicalis.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T19:57:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097857#M1070771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;lets start again &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; what is the issue you having on these two units. I believe, you saying when you do a failover between two units their is a connectivity issue/lost in between? or you see a downtime in your network?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;please provide show failover history show run failover on both unit.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;looking into your text file everything is configured fine. give us more information what is the issue is and what exactly you help on.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 20:16:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097857#M1070771</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T20:16:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097920#M1070774</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for the information, is the failover 40-second delay you were mentioned, from Active to Standby failover, or both failover taking the same time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;how is these device connected? the same switch or a different location?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 21:58:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097920#M1070774</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T21:58:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097923#M1070775</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 22:16:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097923#M1070775</guid>
      <dc:creator>angranados@la.logicalis.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T22:16:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097925#M1070776</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Devices are in the same room, side by side.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 22:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097925#M1070776</guid>
      <dc:creator>angranados@la.logicalis.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T22:03:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097930#M1070777</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am&amp;nbsp; running routing protocols, OSPF (Open Shortest Path First),&amp;nbsp; which &amp;nbsp; is forced to re-establish adjacencies. Because of this behavior I end up with long convergence times and routes flapping&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 22:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097930#M1070777</guid>
      <dc:creator>angranados@la.logicalis.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T22:09:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5500 failover time optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097940#M1070780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see you running OSPF when doing failover the adjacencies are re-establishes however if i remember ospf adjanecnies take around between 5 to 10 seconds. have you configured the stateful failover too? just thinking stateful failover will replicate but you will still see the new adjacenies. Is this failover vlan is also a part of ospf?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 22:40:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5500-failover-time-optimization/m-p/4097940#M1070780</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T22:40:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

