<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IKE V2 Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ike-v2-question/m-p/4148122#M1073708</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/320506"&gt;@carl_townshend&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes, that's right. For stability aand security reasons, prefer IKEv2 hiwhc is supported across all vendors as today.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:17:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruben Cocheno</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-09T00:17:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IKE V2 Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ike-v2-question/m-p/4147344#M1073678</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With IKE V2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe it still has a phase and phase 2 proposal (init and auth)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the ASA, is the ike policy the phase 1 and the ipsec proposal phase 2 for ike v2?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 14:34:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ike-v2-question/m-p/4147344#M1073678</guid>
      <dc:creator>carl_townshend</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-07T14:34:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IKE V2 Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ike-v2-question/m-p/4147349#M1073680</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes. The IKEv2 policy is used to establish the IKEv2 SA (INIT/Phase 1) and the IPSec Proposal (Transform Set) is used to establish the IPSec SA (AUTH/Phase 2).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 16:51:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ike-v2-question/m-p/4147349#M1073680</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-07T16:51:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IKE V2 Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ike-v2-question/m-p/4148122#M1073708</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/320506"&gt;@carl_townshend&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes, that's right. For stability aand security reasons, prefer IKEv2 hiwhc is supported across all vendors as today.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:17:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ike-v2-question/m-p/4148122#M1073708</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ruben Cocheno</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-09T00:17:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

