<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA5506 - port redirection is not working as expected in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-port-redirection-is-not-working-as-expected/m-p/4163042#M1074503</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I would be very worried if i have this rule in my firewall.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;interface GigabitEthernet1/8
 nameif connectip
 security-level 0
 ip address x.y.z.90 255.255.255.248 
!
&lt;STRONG&gt;access-list connectip_access_in extended permit ip any any&lt;/STRONG&gt; 
access-list connectip_access_in extended permit object-group DM_INLINE_SERVICE_2 any any 
access-list connectip_access_in extended deny tcp any any object-group Netbios-TCP 
access-list connectip_access_in extended deny udp any any object-group Netbios-UDP  
!
access-group connectip_access_in in interface connectip&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;have you tested this with packet tracer..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;packet-tracer input connectip tcp 8.8.8.8 12345 a.b.c.138 443 transmit&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;looking in to your capture you are receving RST. i could be the server at your end resting the connection.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 18:51:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-07T18:51:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA5506 - port redirection is not working as expected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-port-redirection-is-not-working-as-expected/m-p/4160765#M1074376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;today I need your advice regarding a port redirection on ASA5506 running 9.12(4)2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The customer wants give access to an internal server 192.168.100.33 on the inside interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on port 443 and 3478 to outside users by accessing a second public IP address x.y.z.91&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by using the same port numbers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Relevant configuration lines:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;interface GigabitEthernet1/2
 nameif inside
 security-level 100
 ip address 192.168.100.3 255.255.255.0 
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/8
 nameif connectip
 security-level 0
 ip address x.y.z.90 255.255.255.248 
!
...
object network connectip-x.y.z.91
 host x.y.z.91
...
object network obj-host-nat-192.168.100.33-443
 host 192.168.100.33
...
object network obj-host-nat-192.168.100.33-3478
 host 192.168.100.33
...
object network obj-host-nat-192.168.100.33-443
 nat (inside,connectip) static connectip-x.y.z.91 service tcp https https 
...
object network obj-host-nat-192.168.100.33-3478
 nat (inside,connectip) static connectip-x.y.z.91 service tcp 3478 3478 
...
access-list connectip_access_in extended permit ip any any 
...
access-group connectip_access_in in interface connectip&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second public IP address is in the range given by the ISP x.y.z.90 255.255.255.248.&lt;BR /&gt;My questions:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Is this possible at all?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. Is it not necessary to have a separate public IP address for each port he want to redirect?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3. Can you see a configuration mistake?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have attached the whole configuration in the hope you can give advice.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks a lot for every hint!!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bye&lt;BR /&gt;T.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 14:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-port-redirection-is-not-working-as-expected/m-p/4160765#M1074376</guid>
      <dc:creator>swscco001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-02T14:41:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5506 - port redirection is not working as expected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-port-redirection-is-not-working-as-expected/m-p/4160770#M1074377</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/96014"&gt;@swscco001&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The configuration you provided looks ok and should work. Are you experiencing an issue? If you are run packet-tracer from the CLI and provide the output for review.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You do not need a separate public IP address for each port to be redirected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 14:49:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-port-redirection-is-not-working-as-expected/m-p/4160770#M1074377</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-02T14:49:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5506 - port redirection is not working as expected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-port-redirection-is-not-working-as-expected/m-p/4162726#M1074491</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the hints!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When I trace on the outside interface "connectip" I see that when the remote public IP a.b.c.138 sends a TCP SYN&lt;BR /&gt;the second public IP address x.y.z.91 of the ASA answers with TCP RST,ACK immediately! (see attached screen dump)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the access is coming from the public IP-Adr. outside to the second public IP address x.y.z.91 is the nat&lt;BR /&gt;command not wrong in this case?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Should it not be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;object network connectip-x.y.z.91&lt;BR /&gt; nat (connectip,inside) static obj-host-nat-192.168.100.33-443 service tcp https https&lt;BR /&gt;...&lt;BR /&gt;object network connectip-x.y.z.91&lt;BR /&gt; nat (connectip,inside) static obj-host-nat-192.168.100.33-3478 service tcp 3478 3478&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd like to hear you opinion!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bye&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;T.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 12:23:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-port-redirection-is-not-working-as-expected/m-p/4162726#M1074491</guid>
      <dc:creator>swscco001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-07T12:23:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA5506 - port redirection is not working as expected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-port-redirection-is-not-working-as-expected/m-p/4163042#M1074503</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would be very worried if i have this rule in my firewall.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;interface GigabitEthernet1/8
 nameif connectip
 security-level 0
 ip address x.y.z.90 255.255.255.248 
!
&lt;STRONG&gt;access-list connectip_access_in extended permit ip any any&lt;/STRONG&gt; 
access-list connectip_access_in extended permit object-group DM_INLINE_SERVICE_2 any any 
access-list connectip_access_in extended deny tcp any any object-group Netbios-TCP 
access-list connectip_access_in extended deny udp any any object-group Netbios-UDP  
!
access-group connectip_access_in in interface connectip&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;have you tested this with packet tracer..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;packet-tracer input connectip tcp 8.8.8.8 12345 a.b.c.138 443 transmit&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;looking in to your capture you are receving RST. i could be the server at your end resting the connection.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 18:51:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-port-redirection-is-not-working-as-expected/m-p/4163042#M1074503</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-07T18:51:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

