<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 4120 ASA Throughput in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163735#M1074564</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;so if I just inspect the torrent traffic we're good.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WiLL-I-Am</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-08T19:33:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>4120 ASA Throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163718#M1074556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 895px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/85509iFC86E2E00322B2C4/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you help me with this chart, what portion of the Appliance are they referring to by NGFW(next generation firewall), by NGFW I guess they mean FTD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I mounted an ASA 9.12.3.12 on top of the FXOS(supervisor) 2.8(1.125), If I don't use the FTD or and deep packet inspection or URL filtering, can I get 60Gb throughput?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163718#M1074556</guid>
      <dc:creator>WiLL-I-Am</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T19:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4120 ASA Throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163721#M1074557</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/893003"&gt;@WiLL-I-Am&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you intend on running ASA code on the FPR4120 then yes you'd get 60Gbps firewall throughput. If you run FTD code without NGFW features, then you get 60Gbps aswell.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;FYI, you are referencing the wrong table for ASA capabilities, see "Table 2 - ASA performance and capabilities" further down the datasheet page...though the performance is still the same in this instance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163721#M1074557</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T19:12:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4120 ASA Throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163726#M1074560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I do some levels of L7 inspection with just the ASA code and still get the same throughput?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:23:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163726#M1074560</guid>
      <dc:creator>WiLL-I-Am</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T19:23:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4120 ASA Throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163734#M1074563</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I doubt it, I'd imagine 30Gbps approx if you are statefully inspecting multiple protocols.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="asa.PNG" style="width: 520px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/85518iF0D3CF103A34E3BF/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="asa.PNG" alt="asa.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163734#M1074563</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T19:29:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4120 ASA Throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163735#M1074564</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;so if I just inspect the torrent traffic we're good.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/4120-asa-throughput/m-p/4163735#M1074564</guid>
      <dc:creator>WiLL-I-Am</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T19:33:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

