<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FTD - BGP Neighbor on LoopBack in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4193563#M1076421</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Dear all ,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;How can I create a LoopBack on my FTD . I dont want my BGP Neighbor to be related to my physical FTD´s interface. I have two links and I´d like my BGP neighbor to be assigned on my Loopback interface.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;As i know FTD does not have LoopBack.&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any althernative of loopback and Physical FTDs interface?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I highly appreciate your kind guidance.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 00:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shervin SoAb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-05T00:17:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FTD - BGP Neighbor on LoopBack</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4193563#M1076421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Dear all ,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;How can I create a LoopBack on my FTD . I dont want my BGP Neighbor to be related to my physical FTD´s interface. I have two links and I´d like my BGP neighbor to be assigned on my Loopback interface.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;As i know FTD does not have LoopBack.&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any althernative of loopback and Physical FTDs interface?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I highly appreciate your kind guidance.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 00:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4193563#M1076421</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shervin SoAb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-05T00:17:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD - BGP Neighbor on LoopBack</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4193603#M1076427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;FTD not support Loopback interface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 17:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4193603#M1076427</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-04T17:28:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD - BGP Neighbor on LoopBack</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4193631#M1076428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;what is the solution in this case?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 18:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4193631#M1076428</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shervin SoAb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-04T18:05:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD - BGP Neighbor on LoopBack</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4194117#M1076457</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 21:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4194117#M1076457</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shervin SoAb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-17T21:19:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD - BGP Neighbor on LoopBack</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4194156#M1076460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is currently no alternative to using the FTD interface address as a BGP neighbor (assuming a non-VTI neighbor). The interface can be physical or logical (e.g., portchannel interface or a subinterface). There is no loopback interface on FTD devices (and I have not heard of any plans to introduce one).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We can form neighbor relationships with Virtual Tunnel Interfaces (VTIs), but only over a route-based site-to-site VPN&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4194156#M1076460</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-06T14:23:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD - BGP Neighbor on LoopBack</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4260372#M1076762</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In my case, I don't want my neighbors to be related to physical or logical (e.g., portchannel interface or a subinterface) because if the interface goes down and up , it takes long time to be neighbor again and get its database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does Cisco have any solution for this case?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 21:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4260372#M1076762</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shervin SoAb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-17T21:30:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD - BGP Neighbor on LoopBack</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4260397#M1076763</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Config BGP with BFD this make ASA not wait peer hold time of BGP but it use BFD to detect the peer failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this why when one ISP down the BGP immediately failure over to other ISP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:32:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4260397#M1076763</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-17T22:32:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD - BGP Neighbor on LoopBack</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4260398#M1076764</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa96/configuration/general/asa-96-general-config/route-bfd.html#ID-2100-00000059" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa96/configuration/general/asa-96-general-config/route-bfd.html#ID-2100-00000059&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:32:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-bgp-neighbor-on-loopback/m-p/4260398#M1076764</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-17T22:32:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

