<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA Link To StackWise Pair in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-link-to-stackwise-pair/m-p/4320728#M1079945</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ref. diagram attached.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Focusing on the ASA uplinks and downlinks to a pair of C9500 switches which are configured in a StackWise Virtual mode. The two physical ports on the ASA will be bundled into a L3 Port-Channel. From the ASA, each physical port will be connected to switch A and the other physical port will be connected to switch B in the stackwise domain. I was wondering if this design would work from the ASA stand-point. Meaning, can an ASA configured in a port-channel have one port connected to a switch and the other port connected to another switch considering that the switches are configured in a visualized mode (SV or VSS)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best, ~zK&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 23:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>zekebashi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-08T23:00:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA Link To StackWise Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-link-to-stackwise-pair/m-p/4320728#M1079945</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ref. diagram attached.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Focusing on the ASA uplinks and downlinks to a pair of C9500 switches which are configured in a StackWise Virtual mode. The two physical ports on the ASA will be bundled into a L3 Port-Channel. From the ASA, each physical port will be connected to switch A and the other physical port will be connected to switch B in the stackwise domain. I was wondering if this design would work from the ASA stand-point. Meaning, can an ASA configured in a port-channel have one port connected to a switch and the other port connected to another switch considering that the switches are configured in a visualized mode (SV or VSS)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best, ~zK&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 23:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-link-to-stackwise-pair/m-p/4320728#M1079945</guid>
      <dc:creator>zekebashi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-08T23:00:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA Link To StackWise Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-link-to-stackwise-pair/m-p/4320802#M1079947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes - we can do a portchannel from ASA to multiple downstream switches that are configured as Stackwise, Stackwise Virtual, VSS or Nexus vPC&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 04:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-link-to-stackwise-pair/m-p/4320802#M1079947</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-09T04:10:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

