https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/eigrp-routes/m-p/4391217#M1080215 <P>Does we need eigrp protocol no both sides. For example If i am using Eigrp protocol on one router and static routes on other router. Does it work or not!!!</P> Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:12:50 GMT nishakhanal 2021-04-22T05:12:50Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/eigrp-routes/m-p/4391217#M1080215 <P>Does we need eigrp protocol no both sides. For example If i am using Eigrp protocol on one router and static routes on other router. Does it work or not!!!</P> Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:12:50 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/eigrp-routes/m-p/4391217#M1080215 nishakhanal 2021-04-22T05:12:50Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/eigrp-routes/m-p/4391302#M1080217 <P>No this will not work.&nbsp; If you are using a dynamic routing protocol like EIGRP you need to configure this on both sides.</P> Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:30:37 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/eigrp-routes/m-p/4391302#M1080217 Marius Gunnerud 2021-04-22T07:30:37Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/eigrp-routes/m-p/4391758#M1080243 <P>Routing protocol like EIGRP, OSPF, RIP will exchange routes only if both routers are directly-connected neighbors and share link together (are on common subnet) and have same protocol enabled.&nbsp; If you and I are neighbors and talking EIGRP, we can exchange what we know and have (routes from others or redistributed or direct connected networks (interfaces with IPs and UP/UP). Note: you can have 2 neighbors via L2 switch which is still considered "directly connected".&nbsp; </P> <P>So, no, having Eigrp on one router and static routes on other router will not work. </P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>Regards, ML<BR />**Please Rate All Helpful Responses **</P> Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:58:12 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/eigrp-routes/m-p/4391758#M1080243 Martin L 2021-04-22T18:58:12Z