<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Having a NAT Problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415765#M1081420</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Alright, so, issuing the NAT command as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object network dmz-device&lt;BR /&gt;nat (dmz,outside) static interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gives me:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[WARNING] nat (dmz,outside) static interface&lt;BR /&gt;All traffic destined to the IP address of the outside interface is being redirected.&lt;BR /&gt;WARNING: Users may not be able to access any service enabled on the outside interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No problems there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Packet tracer now works:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;packet-tracer input outside udp 3.3.3.3 500 4.4.4.4 500 det&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Packet allowed.&amp;nbsp; I don't know why it wasn't.&amp;nbsp; I blew away the NAT, recreated it, and just re-attemped the packet-tracer, and everything works as expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm going to leave it alone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the caveat about not being able to establish a VPN on that interface.&amp;nbsp; That shouldn't be a problem.&amp;nbsp; I've got another interface that all of my other S2S tunnels are on, this particular one involves a vendor's "closed" system necessitating the dedicated cable modem link/interface and using their device sitting in my DMZ as the VPN peer for that setup.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you again!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 21:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brian.emil.harris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-09T21:22:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Having a NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415665#M1081411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So, in this particular configuration, I have an ASA connected to a cable modem, providing me a single static IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cable modem gateway - 1.1.1.2 /30&lt;BR /&gt;ASA interface "outside" - 1.1.1.1 /30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a DMZ setup, with a single device in it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA interface "dmz" - 2.2.2.1 /30&lt;BR /&gt;DMZ device - 2.2.2.2 /30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to allow the device in the DMZ to establish an IKEv2/IPSEC tunnel to AWS, and allow AWS to establish the same to the device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I try to Static NAT 2.2.2.2 to 1.1.1.1, the ASA won't let me:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;[ERROR] nat (dmz-device,outside) static outside-IP&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Address 1.1.1.1 overlaps with outside interface address.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ERROR: NAT Policy is not downloaded&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;What am I doing wrong in my NAT config / how do I properly NAT this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 18:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415665#M1081411</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian.emil.harris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-09T18:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Having a NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415672#M1081413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/66201"&gt;@brian.emil.harris&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; try this, use "interface".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;object DMZ-DEVICE&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;host 2.2.2.2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;nat (dmz,outside) static &lt;STRONG&gt;interface&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 18:30:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415672#M1081413</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-09T18:30:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Having a NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415715#M1081417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should I be able to successfully packet-tracer this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically, from the peer IP of the AWS to the external IP/NAT of the interface, udp/500 and see it unwrap and send to the 2.2.2.2 host?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because my packet-tracer is failing after the ACCESS-LIST, drop by implicit rule...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 20:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415715#M1081417</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian.emil.harris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-09T20:03:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Having a NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415723#M1081418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes you can, you need to use the NAT ip address as the destination rather than the real IP address. Provide the output of the CLI for review.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How is your inbound ACL configured?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;FYI, You'll also not be able to terminate a VPN on the outside interface as udp/500 is now in use by the NAT object.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 20:20:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415723#M1081418</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-09T20:20:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Having a NAT Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415765#M1081420</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Alright, so, issuing the NAT command as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object network dmz-device&lt;BR /&gt;nat (dmz,outside) static interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gives me:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[WARNING] nat (dmz,outside) static interface&lt;BR /&gt;All traffic destined to the IP address of the outside interface is being redirected.&lt;BR /&gt;WARNING: Users may not be able to access any service enabled on the outside interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No problems there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Packet tracer now works:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;packet-tracer input outside udp 3.3.3.3 500 4.4.4.4 500 det&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Packet allowed.&amp;nbsp; I don't know why it wasn't.&amp;nbsp; I blew away the NAT, recreated it, and just re-attemped the packet-tracer, and everything works as expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm going to leave it alone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the caveat about not being able to establish a VPN on that interface.&amp;nbsp; That shouldn't be a problem.&amp;nbsp; I've got another interface that all of my other S2S tunnels are on, this particular one involves a vendor's "closed" system necessitating the dedicated cable modem link/interface and using their device sitting in my DMZ as the VPN peer for that setup.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you again!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 21:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/having-a-nat-problem/m-p/4415765#M1081420</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian.emil.harris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-09T21:22:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

