<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco FTD SLOWLORIS DOS ATTACK VULNERABILITY in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-ftd-slowloris-dos-attack-vulnerability/m-p/4430507#M1082111</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys, I hope you are doing well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our infrastructure is now being audited by a third-party company. We have 6 FTDs in our infrastructure and they examined only one of them with a "Slowloris" or "Slow Http" vulnerability and not the other ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of the FTDs are operating on 6.6.1 version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have searched a lot and could not find a single document or a post in this case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please help me find a document which shows that this version is not vulnerable in this regard?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peyman&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 12:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>peymansarayeli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-09T12:50:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco FTD SLOWLORIS DOS ATTACK VULNERABILITY</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-ftd-slowloris-dos-attack-vulnerability/m-p/4430507#M1082111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys, I hope you are doing well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our infrastructure is now being audited by a third-party company. We have 6 FTDs in our infrastructure and they examined only one of them with a "Slowloris" or "Slow Http" vulnerability and not the other ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of the FTDs are operating on 6.6.1 version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have searched a lot and could not find a single document or a post in this case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please help me find a document which shows that this version is not vulnerable in this regard?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peyman&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 12:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-ftd-slowloris-dos-attack-vulnerability/m-p/4430507#M1082111</guid>
      <dc:creator>peymansarayeli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-09T12:50:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco FTD SLOWLORIS DOS ATTACK VULNERABILITY</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-ftd-slowloris-dos-attack-vulnerability/m-p/4430527#M1082112</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure - we need full report or look at 6.7 fixes some bugs :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvu54706" target="_blank"&gt;https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvu54706&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (not sure i am guess you effecting with this i guess here)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/670/relnotes/firepower-release-notes-670/resolved_issues.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/670/relnotes/firepower-release-notes-670/resolved_issues.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 13:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-ftd-slowloris-dos-attack-vulnerability/m-p/4430527#M1082112</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-09T13:13:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

