<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA' proxy-arp doesnt work in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-proxy-arp-doesnt-work/m-p/4433196#M1082248</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hmm so the double negative means the interface &lt;STRONG&gt;should&lt;/STRONG&gt; proxy-arp as needed. The NAT rule doesn't specify the "no proxy-arp" option so that shouldn't affect it either.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:12:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-14T17:12:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA' proxy-arp doesnt work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-proxy-arp-doesnt-work/m-p/4432886#M1082224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have multisubnet setup where clients behind one of the interfaces fail to configure default gateway properly. to speedup process i've configured NAT-rule (1st in chain)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (VLAN.803,any) source static VLAN803 VLAN803 destination static BMUVLANS BMUVLANS route-lookup&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with it i expected ASA to start to respond ARP-queries from clients in VLAN 803 with its own VLAN.803 MAC, but it doesnt do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i've verified it with capture. what can prevent ASA from ARP-proxying in this case?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:13:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-proxy-arp-doesnt-work/m-p/4432886#M1082224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-14T09:13:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA' proxy-arp doesnt work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-proxy-arp-doesnt-work/m-p/4433008#M1082235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Check the output from "show run all | i proxyarp".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-proxy-arp-doesnt-work/m-p/4433008#M1082235</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-14T12:29:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA' proxy-arp doesnt work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-proxy-arp-doesnt-work/m-p/4433011#M1082236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Marvin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;highly appreciate your input, it looks like this for target VLAN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no sysopt noproxyarp VLAN.803 .&amp;nbsp; negating of negating&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:34:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-proxy-arp-doesnt-work/m-p/4433011#M1082236</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-14T12:34:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA' proxy-arp doesnt work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-proxy-arp-doesnt-work/m-p/4433196#M1082248</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hmm so the double negative means the interface &lt;STRONG&gt;should&lt;/STRONG&gt; proxy-arp as needed. The NAT rule doesn't specify the "no proxy-arp" option so that shouldn't affect it either.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:12:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-proxy-arp-doesnt-work/m-p/4433196#M1082248</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-14T17:12:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

