<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4454591#M1083139</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am in fact running version 6.6.4, I managed to partially get it to work using a workaround to configure &lt;STRONG&gt;bgp-set-clause&lt;/STRONG&gt; to set the next hop as there is a bug which does not let you configure set clause when creating the Route Map in SmartCLI (I have attached a screenshot on how I've set it up.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pbr.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/128762iB60ED98DB8F645E6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pbr.png" alt="pbr.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After that I created a FlexConfig object to attach the above route map to the interface as per below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the above I can confirm that it works however I have an issue that I have no failover for PBR, on an ASA I would have used the following commands:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set ip next hop verify-availability 192.168.22.254 track 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set ip next hop verify-availability 192.168.21.254 track 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which would have enabled failover for PBR using a SLA monitor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was so excited to move from ASA to FTD but it seems that the product has so much less features.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:54:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wcutajar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-08-25T08:54:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4454060#M1083113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I'm trying to set up PBR (Route Maps) on FTD managed by FDM but I'm finding it impossible, on ASA it would look something like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;access-list ROUTEMAP-ACL1 extended permit tcp object CloudKey1 any&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;route-map ROUTEMAP1 permit 10
 match ip address ROUTEMAP-ACL1
 set ip next-hop &amp;lt;IP-ADDRESS-OF-ISP2-GATEWAY&amp;gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I've added the accesslist and the first line of the route-map command via SmartCLI but I'm stuck on how to create the subsequent commands&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I try to use FlexConfig it says that route-map command is blacklisted CLI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 10:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4454060#M1083113</guid>
      <dc:creator>wcutajar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-24T10:50:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4454314#M1083132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please make sure you are running version 6.6 or higher in the FDM and the syntax is the same as ASA.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:15:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4454314#M1083132</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jay Ponce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-24T18:15:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4454591#M1083139</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am in fact running version 6.6.4, I managed to partially get it to work using a workaround to configure &lt;STRONG&gt;bgp-set-clause&lt;/STRONG&gt; to set the next hop as there is a bug which does not let you configure set clause when creating the Route Map in SmartCLI (I have attached a screenshot on how I've set it up.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pbr.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/128762iB60ED98DB8F645E6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pbr.png" alt="pbr.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After that I created a FlexConfig object to attach the above route map to the interface as per below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the above I can confirm that it works however I have an issue that I have no failover for PBR, on an ASA I would have used the following commands:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set ip next hop verify-availability 192.168.22.254 track 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set ip next hop verify-availability 192.168.21.254 track 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which would have enabled failover for PBR using a SLA monitor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was so excited to move from ASA to FTD but it seems that the product has so much less features.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:54:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4454591#M1083139</guid>
      <dc:creator>wcutajar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-25T08:54:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4683748#M1093261</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you share the steps how you applied this route-map to the interface?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 16:09:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4683748#M1093261</guid>
      <dc:creator>engineer467</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-08T16:09:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4684702#M1093307</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Without knowing the steps you are taking to create the route-map, we can only provide information on how a route-map is created using FDM.&amp;nbsp; Check the following link&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/660/fdm/fptd-fdm-config-guide-660/fptd-fdm-route-maps.html#Cisco_Task_in_List_GUI.dita_bc8a9c84-fe6d-41ff-abbe-8438fe37e35d" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/660/fdm/fptd-fdm-config-guide-660/fptd-fdm-route-maps.html#Cisco_Task_in_List_GUI.dita_bc8a9c84-fe6d-41ff-abbe-8438fe37e35d&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2022 20:31:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4684702#M1093307</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-10T20:31:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4709455#M1094460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there, I got same issue in terms of applying route-map to the interface, have you found solution?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/4709455#M1094460</guid>
      <dc:creator>merloxuanyuan23</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-25T14:00:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5066908#M1111062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have created same PBR route-map in smart CLI. But please could you share how to apply the object to the desired interface?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5066908#M1111062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hisoka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-12T06:08:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5136344#M1113808</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi to apply an object to interface do the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Create FlexConfig object with this template:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; interface Ethernetx/x&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; policy-route route-map &amp;lt;your route-map name&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Go to FlexConfig Policy and add your created object to group list. Then deploy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:03:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5136344#M1113808</guid>
      <dc:creator>programmer01001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-26T13:03:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5136371#M1113813</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The more relevant question is why you are running a completely outdated version …&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5136371#M1113813</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-26T13:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5137341#M1113863</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You realize this post is from 2021 right? We decided to move away from Cisco due to lots of these issues, hopefully they have been sorted with newer releases.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 07:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5137341#M1113863</guid>
      <dc:creator>wcutajar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-28T07:25:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5137357#M1113867</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well, I obviously did not realize this. Yes, FDM still has shortcomings that are hard to understand. But overall, the platform evolved really well, and in version 7.2+, there is not much missing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:14:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5137357#M1113867</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-28T08:14:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5137426#M1113873</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;bad to know that, what issue you face (alot) can you summary it&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:48:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5137426#M1113873</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-28T10:48:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5306144#M1121629</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Same problem with me. Multiple ISP is not working in PBR.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;set ip next-hop 10.1.1.1 10.2.2.2&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2025 08:54:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5306144#M1121629</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-06T08:54:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5306147#M1121630</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bmen_0-1751792143631.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/247705iCCDB9B7AAC862D21/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="bmen_0-1751792143631.png" alt="bmen_0-1751792143631.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Multiple ISP is not working. If Primary ISP is down, it will not failover to secondary ISP in PBR.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2025 08:56:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5306147#M1121630</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-06T08:56:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5306148#M1121631</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Make new post please&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2025 09:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5306148#M1121631</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-06T09:02:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Routing on FTD managed by FDM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5322752#M1122335</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is pbr available now&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 06:33:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-based-routing-on-ftd-managed-by-fdm/m-p/5322752#M1122335</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fartingdragon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-21T06:33:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

