<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Access Control Policy Rule in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-control-policy-rule/m-p/4521718#M1085942</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So hope ive been getting this right if i want to block traffic to and from the same addresses I creat a rule it would be as the below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;source&lt;/STRONG&gt; ANY&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;destination&lt;/STRONG&gt; ANY&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;source networks&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;23.33.44.55&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;destination networks&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;22.33.44.55&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Source ports&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Any&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Dest ports&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;ANY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;and block with reset&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;??&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>benolyndav</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-20T17:46:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Access Control Policy Rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-control-policy-rule/m-p/4521718#M1085942</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So hope ive been getting this right if i want to block traffic to and from the same addresses I creat a rule it would be as the below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;source&lt;/STRONG&gt; ANY&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;destination&lt;/STRONG&gt; ANY&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;source networks&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;23.33.44.55&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;destination networks&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;22.33.44.55&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Source ports&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Any&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Dest ports&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;ANY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;and block with reset&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;??&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-control-policy-rule/m-p/4521718#M1085942</guid>
      <dc:creator>benolyndav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T17:46:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access Control Policy Rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-control-policy-rule/m-p/4521722#M1085943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/445131"&gt;@benolyndav&lt;/a&gt; You'd need 2 rules, 1 from "any" to 22.33.44.55 block with reset and another from 22.33.44.55 to "any" block with reset.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-control-policy-rule/m-p/4521722#M1085943</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T17:52:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access Control Policy Rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-control-policy-rule/m-p/4521743#M1085944</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Traffic the other way would be blocked anyway unless explicitly allowed from Outside to inside so is the 2nd rule even needed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-control-policy-rule/m-p/4521743#M1085944</guid>
      <dc:creator>benolyndav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T19:01:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access Control Policy Rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-control-policy-rule/m-p/4521746#M1085945</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/445131"&gt;@benolyndav&lt;/a&gt; sure if you've an explict or implict deny rule at the bottom of the ACP from outside to inside, then yes it would not be needed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-control-policy-rule/m-p/4521746#M1085945</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T19:06:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

