<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Difference between grouped object network hosts and object-network in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-grouped-object-network-hosts-and-object/m-p/4533770#M1086549</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello World,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have to add 1800+ IPs to block on ASA 5516x and I was wondering if there is a fundamental difference between creating each 'object network &amp;lt;name&amp;gt;' and adding them to a group, vs creating the 'object-network Blacklist' group and then adding each host in the sub-menu context with 'network-object w.x.y.z mask'. Is there less overhead the second way?&amp;nbsp; In testing I only see the network object listed once under the group object in the running config as opposed to the first way, where I see the object itself listed, then again under the group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank You&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-t&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 02:15:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tclausen1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-19T02:15:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Difference between grouped object network hosts and object-network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-grouped-object-network-hosts-and-object/m-p/4533770#M1086549</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello World,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have to add 1800+ IPs to block on ASA 5516x and I was wondering if there is a fundamental difference between creating each 'object network &amp;lt;name&amp;gt;' and adding them to a group, vs creating the 'object-network Blacklist' group and then adding each host in the sub-menu context with 'network-object w.x.y.z mask'. Is there less overhead the second way?&amp;nbsp; In testing I only see the network object listed once under the group object in the running config as opposed to the first way, where I see the object itself listed, then again under the group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank You&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-t&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 02:15:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-grouped-object-network-hosts-and-object/m-p/4533770#M1086549</guid>
      <dc:creator>tclausen1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-19T02:15:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Difference between grouped object network hosts and object-network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-grouped-object-network-hosts-and-object/m-p/4534049#M1086564</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If they are individual host, that is the only Option you have to add each host to Object Group.&amp;nbsp; if you add network other device in the network get blocked. so personally i only see that option.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From my notes difference between host and network.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- object just contains a single type of object, whether it's network object (single IP address or subnet), or service object (tcp port(s), protocol, udp port(s)).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- object group contains a group of objects, so you can combine all the same type of objects into a group, eg: a single IP, subnets, different subnets, different IP into one network object-group.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-grouped-object-network-hosts-and-object/m-p/4534049#M1086564</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-19T11:00:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

