<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is unregistered FTD still functional? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4558979#M1087649</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a FTD A/P pair registered after purchase. They are working well until last month. They have lost the licenses without reason and became unregistered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the first time I met after more than ten years pratices on Cisco devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to know the following if you guys can help me:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1/ What are the potential causes to make them lost?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2/ If the FTD are unregistered, can they continue to work as before, eg. to permit/deny traffic flow according to the policy? (I noticed that I cannot apply changes)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>h.dam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-24T15:52:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is unregistered FTD still functional?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4558979#M1087649</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a FTD A/P pair registered after purchase. They are working well until last month. They have lost the licenses without reason and became unregistered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the first time I met after more than ten years pratices on Cisco devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to know the following if you guys can help me:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1/ What are the potential causes to make them lost?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2/ If the FTD are unregistered, can they continue to work as before, eg. to permit/deny traffic flow according to the policy? (I noticed that I cannot apply changes)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4558979#M1087649</guid>
      <dc:creator>h.dam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T15:52:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is unregistered FTD still functional?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4558982#M1087650</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You may be affected by this field notice:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/field-notices/721/fn72103.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/field-notices/721/fn72103.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you noticed, policy changes are not allowed without any license. Existing Access Control Policies will continue to work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4558982#M1087650</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T15:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is unregistered FTD still functional?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4559139#M1087652</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Marvin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for the document.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My FTDs are v7.0.1.But I didn't find this version in the document.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I understood, there are two solutions. 1/ software upgrade 2/ import the IdenTrust Commercial CA certificate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my case, which solution do I need to do?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 21:00:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4559139#M1087652</guid>
      <dc:creator>h.dam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T21:00:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is unregistered FTD still functional?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4559379#M1087660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've found that even if you have 7.0.1 you may still need to "remove the certificate file at &lt;CODE class="cCN_CmdName" style="white-space: pre; font-style: unset !important; font-weight: unset !important; font-family: unset !important;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;/etc/sf/gch/call_home_ca&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt; and restart the Smart Licensing Agent (sla) process to resume communications with Cisco Smart Software Manager (CSSM)".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please refer to the field notice that I linked earlier for the step-by-step instructions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:18:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4559379#M1087660</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-25T08:18:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is unregistered FTD still functional?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4559693#M1087690</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/is-unregistered-ftd-still-functional/m-p/4559693#M1087690</guid>
      <dc:creator>h.dam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-25T15:00:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

