<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: connect two group redundancy firewall in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616902#M1090396</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Logically two switches so that there's always connectivity should one of them fail. A trunk link between the switches&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here's a document -&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/conf_gd/failover.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/conf_gd/failover.html&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;(refer section unit health monitoring)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 02:02:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Udupi Krishna.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-25T02:02:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>connect two group redundancy firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616130#M1090351</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Alls,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question when I try to connect 2 group of redundancy Firewall as picture below. I never try before. Is it possible to connect like picture and what I need to configure in both side?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Untitled.png" style="width: 397px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/151842i624C212BA70AE5E4/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Untitled.png" alt="Untitled.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance, and have a very nice day!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 09:51:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616130#M1090351</guid>
      <dc:creator>hungvu.bk37</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-24T09:51:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: connect two group redundancy firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616408#M1090356</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If this is a like a perimeter firewall pair and LAN/data centre pair sure, but i would recommend getting some switches in between and do not connect them directly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;While a number of potential problems/limitations can be pointed out with connecting them directly, if FW1 or FW2 active and standby interfaces are to be monitored, they would start exchanging heat beat packets. If those interfaces are directly connected to other firewall's interface there's a potential loss of such packets causing failover issues.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 11:58:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616408#M1090356</guid>
      <dc:creator>Udupi Krishna.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-24T11:58:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: connect two group redundancy firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616900#M1090394</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1277181"&gt;@Udupi Krishna.&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I asking exactly how many switch we need to add between them? and Do you have any topic and document related to "heat beat packets"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a nice day.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 01:50:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616900#M1090394</guid>
      <dc:creator>hungvu.bk37</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-25T01:50:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: connect two group redundancy firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616902#M1090396</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Logically two switches so that there's always connectivity should one of them fail. A trunk link between the switches&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here's a document -&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/conf_gd/failover.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/conf_gd/failover.html&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;(refer section unit health monitoring)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 02:02:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616902#M1090396</guid>
      <dc:creator>Udupi Krishna.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-25T02:02:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: connect two group redundancy firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616915#M1090399</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1277181"&gt;@Udupi Krishna.&lt;/a&gt;, thank for your support&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 02:42:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/connect-two-group-redundancy-firewall/m-p/4616915#M1090399</guid>
      <dc:creator>hungvu.bk37</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-25T02:42:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

