<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Firepower between ASA and Juniper. in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-between-asa-and-juniper/m-p/4689842#M1093473</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Firepower is setup with ASA behind it. Need to setup IPSec between ASA and Outside/internet JuniperFW. I can see IKE and ISAKMP packets, but no ESP. Is this even possible:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use FMC to traverse IPSEC for an internal ASA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any inherent policy in FMC that blocks ESP&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 12:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>guna.neo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-19T12:52:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firepower between ASA and Juniper.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-between-asa-and-juniper/m-p/4689842#M1093473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Firepower is setup with ASA behind it. Need to setup IPSec between ASA and Outside/internet JuniperFW. I can see IKE and ISAKMP packets, but no ESP. Is this even possible:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use FMC to traverse IPSEC for an internal ASA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any inherent policy in FMC that blocks ESP&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 12:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-between-asa-and-juniper/m-p/4689842#M1093473</guid>
      <dc:creator>guna.neo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-19T12:52:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower between ASA and Juniper.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-between-asa-and-juniper/m-p/4689993#M1093482</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If your default action in the Firepower Access Control Policy is to Block then the ESP (protocol 50) will be blocked.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The typical recommendation for such a use case is to put the source and destination of the IPsec tunnel in a prefilter policy rule with action of Fastpath. That way you skip all other ACP rules and Snort altogether.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:02:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-between-asa-and-juniper/m-p/4689993#M1093482</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-19T17:02:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower between ASA and Juniper.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-between-asa-and-juniper/m-p/4689994#M1093483</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- FYI :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/Example-Configuring-site-to-site-VPN-between-SRX-and-Cisco-ASA-Route-based-VPN?language=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/Example-Configuring-site-to-site-VPN-between-SRX-and-Cisco-ASA-Route-based-VPN?language=en_US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://tungdt.net/configure-site2site-vpn-between-juniper-srx-and-cisco-asa-firewalls/" target="_blank"&gt;https://tungdt.net/configure-site2site-vpn-between-juniper-srx-and-cisco-asa-firewalls/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:05:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-between-asa-and-juniper/m-p/4689994#M1093483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-19T17:05:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

