<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FMT and network object-groups with network ranges? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmt-and-network-object-groups-with-network-ranges/m-p/4719788#M1095002</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, &lt;U&gt;extended access-list objects don't support range objects&lt;/U&gt;. Only host and network objects are supported.&lt;BR /&gt;An enhancement has been raised for this &lt;A href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwa73735" target="_blank"&gt;https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwa73735&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>manabans</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-11T12:47:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FMT and network object-groups with network ranges?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmt-and-network-object-groups-with-network-ranges/m-p/4719768#M1094999</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm working with some offline ASA configurations that I need to merge and push as a single file to the FirePower Migration Tool.&amp;nbsp; It is purely objects, object-groups and ACLs.&amp;nbsp; I have removed all the NAT configuration as I'll create this manually as there isn't much to it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been manipulating the source configuration file so that the FMT doesn't complain about anything, however I've got four ACL lines that it says are unsupported.&amp;nbsp; One is a protocol object-group from any source to a destination network object-group, the other three are tcp from a network object-group to a network object-group with destination port https.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;access-list inside_access_in extended permit object-group XYZ-Ports any object-group XYZ-Cloud-Comms
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp object-group XYZ object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_143 eq https
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp object-group ABC object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_144 eq https
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp object obj-range-10.1.1.137-140 object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_148 eq https
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looking at the network object-groups that are referenced the only thing I can see that is common are network range objects within the groups.&amp;nbsp; Is this a limitation of the FMT?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:42:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmt-and-network-object-groups-with-network-ranges/m-p/4719768#M1094999</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrew.butterworth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-11T11:42:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FMT and network object-groups with network ranges?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmt-and-network-object-groups-with-network-ranges/m-p/4719788#M1095002</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, &lt;U&gt;extended access-list objects don't support range objects&lt;/U&gt;. Only host and network objects are supported.&lt;BR /&gt;An enhancement has been raised for this &lt;A href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwa73735" target="_blank"&gt;https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwa73735&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmt-and-network-object-groups-with-network-ranges/m-p/4719788#M1095002</guid>
      <dc:creator>manabans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-11T12:47:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FMT and network object-groups with network ranges?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmt-and-network-object-groups-with-network-ranges/m-p/4719803#M1095005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply, however that isn't the issue.&amp;nbsp; I can create the objects and policy manually and ranges are supported in the policy and I've checked on the CLI on a test FTD and can see them&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;object network obj-range-10.1.1.17-19
 range 10.1.1.17 10.1.1.19
!
access-list CSM_FW_ACL_ advanced permit tcp ifc inside object obj-range-10.1.1.17-19 ifc outside any4 object-group HTTPS rule-id 268436481
access-list CSM_FW_ACL_ advanced permit tcp ifc inside object obj-range-10.1.1.17-19 ifc outside_static_vti_1 any4 object-group HTTPS rule-id 268436481

&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm guessing its just a limitation of the FMT?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmt-and-network-object-groups-with-network-ranges/m-p/4719803#M1095005</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrew.butterworth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-11T13:29:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

