<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FMC Site to Site VPN Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4732812#M1095662</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;you mean initiate/responder ??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 20:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-05T20:27:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FMC Site to Site VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4732808#M1095661</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been reading through Cisco's site to site documentation and wanted to confirm there's no possible way for a site to site vpn to have both tunnels active? Seems you can only have active/passive.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FMC 7.0 using FTD 2100 series.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 20:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4732808#M1095661</guid>
      <dc:creator>dcanady55</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-05T20:21:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FMC Site to Site VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4732812#M1095662</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you mean initiate/responder ??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 20:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4732812#M1095662</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-05T20:27:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FMC Site to Site VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733312#M1095668</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It isn't clear if you are asking about S2S VPN with an HA pair of FTD appliances or a single FTD appliance with a primary and backup S2S VPN peer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Either way, the answer is "no".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:59:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733312#M1095668</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-06T12:59:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FMC Site to Site VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733376#M1095672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/326046"&gt;@Marvin Rhoads&lt;/a&gt;, are traffic zones still not supported on SVTI tunnels in case of FTD? On ASA it is certainly possible to configure them and achieve ECMP over tunnel interfaces or use them in a primary/backup manner.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is not clear though, is how existing connections are reclassified if one of tunnel interfaces goes down in such scenario.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 14:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733376#M1095672</guid>
      <dc:creator>tvotna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-06T14:40:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FMC Site to Site VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733415#M1095675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1342399"&gt;@tvotna&lt;/a&gt; seems like they are now supported from 7.1 and higher. - &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/secure-firewall/management-center/device-config/730/management-center-device-config-73/routing-ecmp.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/secure-firewall/management-center/device-config/730/management-center-device-config-73/routing-ecmp.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 15:33:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733415#M1095675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-06T15:33:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FMC Site to Site VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733420#M1095676</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes - I believe the recently-introduced route-based (VTI) S2S VPNs along with ECMP are supported. Policy-based (crypto map) does not support it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have not tried it myself yet though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 15:38:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733420#M1095676</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-06T15:38:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FMC Site to Site VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733494#M1095681</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Marvin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, we only have the one FTD in place but soon will have a second FTD setup in HA. I will read up on VTIs and see if those will work in our scenario. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 17:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fmc-site-to-site-vpn-question/m-p/4733494#M1095681</guid>
      <dc:creator>dcanady55</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-06T17:52:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

