<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744703#M1096257</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To portchannel 13 I'm using this below:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jrsouzajr_0-1671832892922.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/171903i1BBD157BD8C5E92B/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="jrsouzajr_0-1671832892922.png" alt="jrsouzajr_0-1671832892922.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 22:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-23T22:01:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744610#M1096246</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;I'm configuring a PBR with SLA monitor, route track and two news default routes. I already configured with flexconfig and applied them.&lt;BR /&gt;Route-map and features SLA monitor, route track was verified, and base-config were correct.&lt;BR /&gt;I had to create two new default routes to forwarding both next hops, but the environment already had a default route with metric 1 (VCS-E - Internet) and I want to use such as primary default route to PBR the others default route created which I'm using route track. (portchannel13).&lt;BR /&gt;Therefore, with this configuration it would be possible to see a positive state (up), but the default route in final configuration is being VCS-E and isn't portchannel13. How can I to resolve this problem?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Below, the outputs:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route-map RM_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE_2, permit, sequence 10&lt;BR /&gt;Match clauses:&lt;BR /&gt;ip address (access-lists): ACL_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Set clauses:&lt;BR /&gt;ip next-hop verify-availability 172.17.62.75 1 track 2 [down]&lt;BR /&gt;ip next-hop verify-availability 172.17.62.76 2 track 1 [down]&lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show access-list ACL_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE&lt;BR /&gt;access-list ACL_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE; 1 elements; name hash: 0x9a5b319a&lt;BR /&gt;access-list ACL_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE line 1 extended permit object-group ProxySG_ExtendedACL_90194396285 object RedeWiFixxxx any (hitcnt=2) 0x9520cedc&lt;BR /&gt;access-list ACL_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE line 1 extended permit ip 172.31.252.0 255.255.254.0 any (hitcnt=2) 0x25cb00ed&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show running-config route&lt;BR /&gt;route Port-channel13 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.17.62.76 2 track 1&lt;BR /&gt;route Port-channel13 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.17.62.75 2 track 2&lt;BR /&gt;route VCS-E_Internet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 179.106.221.225 1&lt;BR /&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show running-config track&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;track 1 rtr 1 reachability&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;track 2 rtr 2 reachability&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show sla monitor configuration&lt;BR /&gt;SA Agent, Infrastructure Engine-II&lt;BR /&gt;Entry number: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Owner:&lt;BR /&gt;Tag:&lt;BR /&gt;Type of operation to perform: echo&lt;BR /&gt;Target address: 172.17.62.76&lt;BR /&gt;Interface: Port-channel13&lt;BR /&gt;Number of packets: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Request size (ARR data portion): 28&lt;BR /&gt;Operation timeout (milliseconds): 5000&lt;BR /&gt;Type Of Service parameters: 0x0&lt;BR /&gt;Verify data: No&lt;BR /&gt;Operation frequency (seconds): 60&lt;BR /&gt;Next Scheduled Start Time: Start Time already passed&lt;BR /&gt;Group Scheduled : FALSE&lt;BR /&gt;Life (seconds): Forever&lt;BR /&gt;Entry Ageout (seconds): never&lt;BR /&gt;Recurring (Starting Everyday): FALSE&lt;BR /&gt;Status of entry (SNMP RowStatus): Active&lt;BR /&gt;Enhanced History:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Entry number: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Owner:&lt;BR /&gt;Tag:&lt;BR /&gt;Type of operation to perform: echo&lt;BR /&gt;Target address: 172.17.62.75&lt;BR /&gt;Interface: Port-channel13&lt;BR /&gt;Number of packets: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Request size (ARR data portion): 28&lt;BR /&gt;Operation timeout (milliseconds): 5000&lt;BR /&gt;Type Of Service parameters: 0x0&lt;BR /&gt;Verify data: No&lt;BR /&gt;Operation frequency (seconds): 60&lt;BR /&gt;Next Scheduled Start Time: Start Time already passed&lt;BR /&gt;Group Scheduled : FALSE&lt;BR /&gt;Life (seconds): Forever&lt;BR /&gt;Entry Ageout (seconds): never&lt;BR /&gt;Recurring (Starting Everyday): FALSE&lt;BR /&gt;Status of entry (SNMP RowStatus): Active&lt;BR /&gt;Enhanced History:&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; show running-config interface Port-channel 11.12&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Port-channel11.12&lt;BR /&gt;vlan 20&lt;BR /&gt;nameif xxxx&lt;BR /&gt;cts manual&lt;BR /&gt;propagate sgt preserve-untag&lt;BR /&gt;policy static sgt disabled trusted&lt;BR /&gt;security-level 0&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.32.1 255.255.255.224&lt;BR /&gt;policy-route route-map RM_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE_2&lt;BR /&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show route 172.17.62.75&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Routing entry for 172.17.62.72 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface)&lt;BR /&gt;Redistributing via ospf 1&lt;BR /&gt;Routing Descriptor Blocks:&lt;BR /&gt;* directly connected, via Port-channel13&lt;BR /&gt;Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; show route 172.17.62.76&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Routing entry for 172.17.62.72 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface)&lt;BR /&gt;Redistributing via ospf 1&lt;BR /&gt;Routing Descriptor Blocks:&lt;BR /&gt;* directly connected, via Port-channel13&lt;BR /&gt;Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1&lt;BR /&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show arp | include 172.17.62.76|172.17.62.75&lt;BR /&gt;Port-channel13 172.17.62.75 20cf.ae56.3402 11751&lt;BR /&gt;Port-channel13 172.17.62.76 6c03.0966.4b82 11901&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744610#M1096246</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T14:05:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744618#M1096248</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;route &lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Port-channel13&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.17.62.76 2 track 1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;route&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; Port-channel13&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.17.62.75 2 track 2&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;this meaning you have SW connect FTD to two router and all three share same subnet?&lt;BR /&gt;if yes why you dont config hsrp in router and point FTD to VIP of HSRP ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and for your other config I will check the track using same source and update you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744618#M1096248</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T14:26:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744636#M1096249</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot (164).png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/171895i21C974C2F8DB92F6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot (164).png" alt="Screenshot (164).png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I run lab and without static route the track is UP since it direct connect.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;and also the traffic (specific traffic match ACL) is use PBR and if both track failed then it will use RIB (&lt;SPAN&gt;VCS-E_Internet).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for other traffic it will use the default route with lowest AD.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;and you can use track1 and track2 to detect the reachability of two path (optional since it direct connect as I assume)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744636#M1096249</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T15:05:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744646#M1096250</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, but my problem is that if I not to use a default route, all traffic to going forwading for VCS-E_Internet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;In FMC the default route VCS-E is used either to other routes. I would like that to reach next-hop 172.17.62.75 and&amp;nbsp;172.17.62.76&amp;nbsp;throught route-map via PBR created. Anyway, I will to have more than one default route:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;RIB: VCS-E metric 1&lt;BR /&gt;PBR: portchannel13 metric 2 with route track e SLA monitor assigned.&lt;BR /&gt;If I remove two default routes point to interface portchannel13 (172.17.62.75 /&amp;nbsp;172.17.62.76), how can I to insert route track?&amp;nbsp; because track is inserted in field during configuration default route.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway, I will to remove two default routes created and Let's see how its works and I update you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:51:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744646#M1096250</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T15:51:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744677#M1096251</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1065752"&gt;@MHM Cisco World&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I only removed two default routes, after this I deployed. But yet I see route-map state: down.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; show running-config route all&lt;BR /&gt;route VCS-E_Internet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 179.106.221.225 1&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; show running-config route-map&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;route-map RM_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE_2 permit 10&lt;BR /&gt;match ip address ACL_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE&lt;BR /&gt;set ip next-hop verify-availability 172.17.62.75 1 track 2&lt;BR /&gt;set ip next-hop verify-availability 172.17.62.76 2 track 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;route-map PUBLICACION-xxxx1 permit 1&lt;BR /&gt;match ip address xxxx1-EXTERNAS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;route-map PUBLICACION-xxxx2 permit 10&lt;BR /&gt;match ip address xxxx2-CONECTADAS&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; show route-map&lt;BR /&gt;route-map RM_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE_2, permit, sequence 10&lt;BR /&gt;Match clauses:&lt;BR /&gt;ip address (access-lists): ACL_PBR_xxxx-MOBILE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Set clauses:&lt;BR /&gt;ip next-hop verify-availability 172.17.62.75 1 track 2 [down]&lt;BR /&gt;ip next-hop verify-availability 172.17.62.76 2 track 1 [down]&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 18:29:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744677#M1096251</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T18:29:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744680#M1096252</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;do you config&lt;BR /&gt;sla monitor schedule start now ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 19:27:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744680#M1096252</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T19:27:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744687#M1096253</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes,&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Both, ip sla and route track has been configured. I removed only two default routes. The IP SLA state was not changed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;below, output sla monitor:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show sla monitor configuration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SA Agent, Infrastructure Engine-II&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Entry number: 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Owner:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tag:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type of operation to perform: echo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Target address: 172.17.62.76&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface: Port-channel13&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of packets: 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Request size (ARR data portion): 28&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Operation timeout (milliseconds): 5000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type Of Service parameters: 0x0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Verify data: No&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Operation frequency (seconds): 60&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Next Scheduled Start Time: Start Time already passed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Group Scheduled : FALSE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Life (seconds): Forever&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Entry Ageout (seconds): never&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recurring (Starting Everyday): FALSE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Status of entry (SNMP RowStatus): Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enhanced History:&lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Entry number: 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Owner:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tag:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type of operation to perform: echo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Target address: 172.17.62.75&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface: Port-channel13&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of packets: 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Request size (ARR data portion): 28&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Operation timeout (milliseconds): 5000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type Of Service parameters: 0x0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Verify data: No&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Operation frequency (seconds): 60&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Next Scheduled Start Time: Start Time already passed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Group Scheduled : FALSE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Life (seconds): Forever&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Entry Ageout (seconds): never&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recurring (Starting Everyday): FALSE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Status of entry (SNMP RowStatus): Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enhanced History:&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744687#M1096253</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T20:27:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744692#M1096254</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;show running-config sla monitor&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;can&amp;nbsp; you share this&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:56:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744692#M1096254</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T20:56:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744695#M1096255</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jrsouzajr_0-1671830710544.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/171902i04C01D5A6834D520/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="jrsouzajr_0-1671830710544.png" alt="jrsouzajr_0-1671830710544.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 21:25:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744695#M1096255</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T21:25:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744699#M1096256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;172.17.62.72 are this IP of the Port-channel 13&amp;nbsp; you use as source of echo ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 21:39:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744699#M1096256</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T21:39:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744703#M1096257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To portchannel 13 I'm using this below:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jrsouzajr_0-1671832892922.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/171903i1BBD157BD8C5E92B/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="jrsouzajr_0-1671832892922.png" alt="jrsouzajr_0-1671832892922.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 22:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744703#M1096257</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T22:01:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744711#M1096258</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;all config from my view is OK, but still track is down!!&lt;BR /&gt;I check one point that can cause this issue,&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;are you config any icmp deny in PortChannel interface &amp;lt;icmp toward interface not icmp pass through interface&amp;gt; ???&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 23:00:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744711#M1096258</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T23:00:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744722#M1096259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All right, thanks for helping me this task and to confirm all config is OK.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, haven't config any icmp deny in Portchannel Interface.&amp;nbsp; I'm not configured any icmp deny but I will to check again. This was only tshoot that&amp;nbsp;I didn't. In fact, this interface&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 23:56:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744722#M1096259</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-23T23:56:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744723#M1096260</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;sorry...... to be continue here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All right, thanks for helping me this task and to confirm all config is OK.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Soo, I didn't have configured any icmp deny in Portchannel Interface.&amp;nbsp; I'm not configuring any icmp deny, but I will to check again. This was a only troubleshooting that&amp;nbsp;I didn't.&lt;BR /&gt;In fact, I tried a ping 172.17.62.75/172.17.62.76 which source is portchannel 13, but isn't works.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;My workday is over and I will to back on monday 8:00AM. I update you again, its ok ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank u so far bro, good night and Merry Christmas!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2022 00:07:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4744723#M1096260</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-24T00:07:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR route-map (down) on FTD 2130</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4765422#M1097330</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After tries unsuccessfully to solve the problem ,&amp;nbsp;I will opening ticket with support cisco (TAC) and to wait a update about this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 20:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pbr-route-map-down-on-ftd-2130/m-p/4765422#M1097330</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrsouzajr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-30T20:09:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

