<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA-5525. How many different ACLs need entries for this circuit? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-how-many-different-acls-need-entries-for-this-circuit/m-p/4782277#M1098151</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1443661"&gt;@MicJameson1&lt;/a&gt; if server1 in the dmz initiates communications, then there would need to be one ACL to permit the traffic, with at least 1 ACE. As the ASA is stateful, the return traffic would automatically be permitted. Meaning you don't need to explicitly permit the return traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interfaces with a lower security level (DMZ) communicating with interfaces with a higher security level (inside) need an ACL to explictly permit traffic. Interfaces with a higher security level communicating with a lower security level do not need an ACL to permit traffic and is permitted as default.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 20:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-24T20:20:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA-5525. How many different ACLs need entries for this circuit?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-how-many-different-acls-need-entries-for-this-circuit/m-p/4782274#M1098150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;SERVER1 (security zone 50 of dmz) ==&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; ASA-5525 ==&amp;gt; inside network (security zone 100) ==&amp;gt; ISR-router ===&amp;gt; www SERVER2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Server1 initiates the connection to server2. Obviously there is return traffic to Server1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Regarding only ASA-5525, how many different ACLs need entries for these servers to communicate in this instance?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 20:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-how-many-different-acls-need-entries-for-this-circuit/m-p/4782274#M1098150</guid>
      <dc:creator>MicJameson1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-24T20:05:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA-5525. How many different ACLs need entries for this circuit?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-how-many-different-acls-need-entries-for-this-circuit/m-p/4782277#M1098151</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1443661"&gt;@MicJameson1&lt;/a&gt; if server1 in the dmz initiates communications, then there would need to be one ACL to permit the traffic, with at least 1 ACE. As the ASA is stateful, the return traffic would automatically be permitted. Meaning you don't need to explicitly permit the return traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interfaces with a lower security level (DMZ) communicating with interfaces with a higher security level (inside) need an ACL to explictly permit traffic. Interfaces with a higher security level communicating with a lower security level do not need an ACL to permit traffic and is permitted as default.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 20:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-how-many-different-acls-need-entries-for-this-circuit/m-p/4782277#M1098151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-24T20:20:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

