<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Firepower Failover behavior in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794088#M1098667</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If the portchannel was dedicated per interface, then all interfaces would need to go down to dictate a failover.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you were using sub interfaces on the portchannel and the sub interface went down, that would cause a failover.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-14T21:44:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firepower Failover behavior</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794045#M1098658</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Context:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Just got an pair of FTD 4140s and 2140s HA configured.&amp;nbsp; They're at v7.0.5 with vFMC and wondering how the FTDs handle failover scenarios.&amp;nbsp; For this question, monitoring is enabled for L2 and L3 interfaces and I have a single Inside (access) and Outside (trunked) configured for each appliance (just for the example, not actual config).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The Question:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Is there a difference in the failover behavior when an entire appliance goes offline versus when an interface goes offline?&amp;nbsp; For example and pretty obvious, if my primary (active) 4140 goes offline for whatever reason, the standby will become active.&amp;nbsp; However, what if an individual interface, L2 or L3, on the primary (active) goes offline?&amp;nbsp; Does the interface itself failover to the standby?&amp;nbsp; Or does the entire standby unit become active?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Addt'l Question:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Does the failover behavior change when Etherchannel/Port-channels are configured?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wreckt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794045#M1098658</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wrecktangle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T20:52:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower Failover behavior</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794049#M1098659</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1314171"&gt;@Wrecktangle&lt;/a&gt; by default the failure of an interface on the Active Firewall (whether it's physical or logical) would cause the standby FTD appliance (the entire standby unit) to become active.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794049#M1098659</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T20:58:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower Failover behavior</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794071#M1098662</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is the information I used when deploying our FTD's with FMC frontend.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/630/fdm/fptd-fdm-config-guide-630/fptd-fdm-ha.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/630/fdm/fptd-fdm-config-guide-630/fptd-fdm-ha.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794071#M1098662</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric R. Jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T21:16:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower Failover behavior</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794078#M1098663</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/97036"&gt;@Rob Ingram&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:(whether it's physical or logical) would cause the standby FTD appliance (the entire standby unit) to become active.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assuming this includes etherchannel/port-channels (logical), why would one use an etherchannel/port-channel say in the case of a 2 or 4-port etherchannel if it will failover if any of those ports go down?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:34:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794078#M1098663</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wrecktangle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T21:34:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower Failover behavior</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794088#M1098667</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the portchannel was dedicated per interface, then all interfaces would need to go down to dictate a failover.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you were using sub interfaces on the portchannel and the sub interface went down, that would cause a failover.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794088#M1098667</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T21:44:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower Failover behavior</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794119#M1098669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Appreciate the enlightenment!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 23:03:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-failover-behavior/m-p/4794119#M1098669</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wrecktangle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T23:03:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

