<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA to Core switch routing best practice in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-to-core-switch-routing-best-practice/m-p/4817532#M1099643</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1495947"&gt;@NetworkMonkey101&lt;/a&gt; I don't think there is a right or wrong answer, it depend on your environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd personally use a routing protocol (OSPF) so the ASA automatically learns new networks from the core switch. Or if you have a small environment with a configuration that doesn't change much then static routes should be fine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-19T07:01:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA to Core switch routing best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-to-core-switch-routing-best-practice/m-p/4817530#M1099642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it best practice to use static routes or a routing protocol between an ASA and core switch to be able to reach inside vlans?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example static route on the ASA would be&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Route inside 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.1 (L3 SVI on core switch)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or is it recommended to use EIGRP/OSPF?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 06:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-to-core-switch-routing-best-practice/m-p/4817530#M1099642</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetworkMonkey101</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-19T06:56:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA to Core switch routing best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-to-core-switch-routing-best-practice/m-p/4817532#M1099643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1495947"&gt;@NetworkMonkey101&lt;/a&gt; I don't think there is a right or wrong answer, it depend on your environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd personally use a routing protocol (OSPF) so the ASA automatically learns new networks from the core switch. Or if you have a small environment with a configuration that doesn't change much then static routes should be fine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-to-core-switch-routing-best-practice/m-p/4817532#M1099643</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-19T07:01:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

