<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FPR3130 HA connectivity in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpr3130-ha-connectivity/m-p/4956787#M1105716</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, To connect FPR3130 in HA, how many interfaces do we need to be configured&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is 1 gig interface good enough or do we require two separate 1 gig interfaces, for stateful failover&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 03:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>arpitsharmanec</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-10T03:07:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FPR3130 HA connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpr3130-ha-connectivity/m-p/4956787#M1105716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, To connect FPR3130 in HA, how many interfaces do we need to be configured&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is 1 gig interface good enough or do we require two separate 1 gig interfaces, for stateful failover&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 03:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpr3130-ha-connectivity/m-p/4956787#M1105716</guid>
      <dc:creator>arpitsharmanec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-10T03:07:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FPR3130 HA connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpr3130-ha-connectivity/m-p/4956918#M1105724</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Only rarely do I see a customer using two interfaces per device. 98-99% of the deployments I see use a single interface for both failover and state.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For the official Cisco recommendation, they say "All other models—1 GB interface is large enough for a combined failover and state link." (meaning all models except 4100/4200 and 9400 series).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/secure-firewall/management-center/device-config/740/management-center-device-config-74/high-availability.html#ID-2107-0000004d" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/secure-firewall/management-center/device-config/740/management-center-device-config-74/high-availability.html#ID-2107-0000004d&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpr3130-ha-connectivity/m-p/4956918#M1105724</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-10T12:35:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FPR3130 HA connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpr3130-ha-connectivity/m-p/4956939#M1105726</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This note was put into documentation when 3100 didn't exist yet. From my experience with multiple Firepowers 4150/4145 the 1Gbps statelink is definitely not enough. If the link is 1Gbps and conn rate is high, the state replication creates a bottleneck for the entire system. So, I'd highly recommend 10Gbps statelink on FP3100. Failover and state can share the same link, but we always use two links to never have a concern that state replication can affect transmission of hellos.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:16:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpr3130-ha-connectivity/m-p/4956939#M1105726</guid>
      <dc:creator>tvotna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-10T13:16:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

