<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Secure firewall 3105 throughput in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994414#M1107809</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Only 900? It is not even closed to advertised 10G&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>peter.matuska1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-01-11T15:06:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Secure firewall 3105 throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994390#M1107805</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;this should be 10G FW but the iperf speedtest result gives me apprx. 650Mbps when testing from A to B. When testing from B to A, I get 900Mbps. The connected interfaces are 1G. When I tested from A to B and from B to A but traffic bypassing the FW, I got 930Mbps so it looks like the FW is an issue. When I configure prefilter I got slightly better results but not 930Mbps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;FW is running 9.3.1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:43:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994390#M1107805</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter.matuska1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-11T14:43:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure firewall 3105 throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994401#M1107806</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes the FW throughput is around 900Mbps&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;if you config prefilter then all traffic pass without inspect, to solve issue I think you need to bypass the FW&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:49:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994401#M1107806</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-11T14:49:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure firewall 3105 throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994414#M1107809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Only 900? It is not even closed to advertised 10G&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994414#M1107809</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter.matuska1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-11T15:06:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure firewall 3105 throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994453#M1107815</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you generate single flow or multiple flows? 3105 has 12 CPU cores, so testing it with a single flow is simply not a valid test.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994453#M1107815</guid>
      <dc:creator>tvotna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-11T15:52:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure firewall 3105 throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994460#M1107817</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;But you are use interface have 1g how you want to get around 10g !!!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Change it to sfp 10g and check again.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994460#M1107817</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-11T15:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure firewall 3105 throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994741#M1107850</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Rated firewall throughput is not for a single flow but rather is an aggregate capacity. That especially applies in non-prefilter uses where the Snort performance (a given flow uses a given instance which is running on a single core), but also applies to prefilter where only LINA and not Snort is in play.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994741#M1107850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-12T02:28:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure firewall 3105 throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994763#M1107851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;firepower performance estimator&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you can access to this' check the throughput when using 1g and 10g.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 04:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994763#M1107851</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-12T04:24:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure firewall 3105 throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994802#M1107852</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ok, so it is by design. I tested the same with different vendor, FW was installed in vmware and single flow was reaching 4Gbps and by adding the CPU it was rising. thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 07:06:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994802#M1107852</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter.matuska1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-12T07:06:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure firewall 3105 throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994812#M1107853</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;one more question. How about IPSec throughput? datasheet says 5,5Gbps. The question is whether I can reach this speed between 2 sites.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 07:23:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/secure-firewall-3105-throughput/m-p/4994812#M1107853</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter.matuska1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-12T07:23:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

