<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NPS Radius in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nps-radius/m-p/5012527#M1108791</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As with any HA, it needs to be implemented redundantly. Sadly, NPS makes this a little bit hard to maintain as there is no synchronization of changed policies. Whenever your network has grown to a size where you need a redundant NPS, I would consider to move to Cisco ISE.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 04:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-02-04T04:09:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NPS Radius</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nps-radius/m-p/5012511#M1108790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How can I ensure high availability for RADIUS service in Windows Server environment ? so it can withstand loss or even temporary downtime of any particular server holding NPS role.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please advice me&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 02:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nps-radius/m-p/5012511#M1108790</guid>
      <dc:creator>leyakhath muhammed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-04T02:06:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NPS Radius</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nps-radius/m-p/5012527#M1108791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As with any HA, it needs to be implemented redundantly. Sadly, NPS makes this a little bit hard to maintain as there is no synchronization of changed policies. Whenever your network has grown to a size where you need a redundant NPS, I would consider to move to Cisco ISE.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 04:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nps-radius/m-p/5012527#M1108791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-04T04:09:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NPS Radius</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nps-radius/m-p/5012551#M1108794</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/112989"&gt;@leyakhath muhammed&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;NPS proxy server load balancing. General idea: use NPS configured as a RADIUS proxy to load balance connection requests between multiple NPSs or other RADIUS servers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 08:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nps-radius/m-p/5012551#M1108794</guid>
      <dc:creator>M02@rt37</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-04T08:45:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

