<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Firepower NAP (Network Analysis policy) Question? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-nap-network-analysis-policy-question/m-p/5043607#M1110014</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to get my head around this to make sure i've understood this correctly. Hopefully someone will be able to clarify it for me.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. As per the below image, I can see that Balanced and security is enabled as a default for NAP in the default network Analysis policy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. if we already have a Default option on that image then what is the first option for? (Intrusion Policy used before acess control rule is determined) , I can see the NAPs i've created on the bottom option, but not on the first drop down menu.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. Am i correct in assuming: once i've created&amp;nbsp; a Rate based attack prevention NAP, (which is built on top of Balanced and security as a base) then i call that NAP in the Default Network Analysis policy section?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. Or will is it better to use the custom rules to call the NAP i've created for the rate based attack prevention?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5. is there any advantage to Having a NAP that's Balanced and security but an IPS policy within one ACP rule is set to security over connectivity? (will this even work?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="TTboy1988_1-1710841709884.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/213123i55CDAA7A6901EDF4/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="TTboy1988_1-1710841709884.png" alt="TTboy1988_1-1710841709884.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:53:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PacketSpartan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-19T09:53:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firepower NAP (Network Analysis policy) Question?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-nap-network-analysis-policy-question/m-p/5043607#M1110014</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to get my head around this to make sure i've understood this correctly. Hopefully someone will be able to clarify it for me.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. As per the below image, I can see that Balanced and security is enabled as a default for NAP in the default network Analysis policy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. if we already have a Default option on that image then what is the first option for? (Intrusion Policy used before acess control rule is determined) , I can see the NAPs i've created on the bottom option, but not on the first drop down menu.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. Am i correct in assuming: once i've created&amp;nbsp; a Rate based attack prevention NAP, (which is built on top of Balanced and security as a base) then i call that NAP in the Default Network Analysis policy section?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. Or will is it better to use the custom rules to call the NAP i've created for the rate based attack prevention?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5. is there any advantage to Having a NAP that's Balanced and security but an IPS policy within one ACP rule is set to security over connectivity? (will this even work?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="TTboy1988_1-1710841709884.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/213123i55CDAA7A6901EDF4/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="TTboy1988_1-1710841709884.png" alt="TTboy1988_1-1710841709884.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:53:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-nap-network-analysis-policy-question/m-p/5043607#M1110014</guid>
      <dc:creator>PacketSpartan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-19T09:53:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

