<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FTD with Inline-Set in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-with-inline-set/m-p/5140268#M1114022</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Transparent mode and inline-set interfaces are different animals. You don't need inline-set interfaces if you want to pass OSPF through. Use transparent mode and regular interfaces instead. I believe that stateful HA doesn't replicate connections created on inline-set interfaces, because those connections are tcp-state-bypass connections from Lina point of view. But upon failover Snort should be able to pickup flows midstream and traffic should not be interrupted. This document explains inline-set interfaces very well:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/firepower-ngfw/200924-configuring-firepower-threat-defense-int.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/firepower-ngfw/200924-configuring-firepower-threat-defense-int.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 20:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tvotna</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-04T20:23:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FTD with Inline-Set</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-with-inline-set/m-p/5140087#M1114005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have 2 units of FTD that will be in transparent mode and I plan to configure it with inline-sets for the IPS and I plan to set it up in active-standby FTD.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Will there still be a stateful failover in transparent FTD with inline-set interfaces?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Can I form an OSPF neighbor with my router if my FTD in transparent mode with Inline-Set interfaces is in between the routers?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-with-inline-set/m-p/5140087#M1114005</guid>
      <dc:creator>fatalXerror</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-04T14:39:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD with Inline-Set</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-with-inline-set/m-p/5140268#M1114022</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Transparent mode and inline-set interfaces are different animals. You don't need inline-set interfaces if you want to pass OSPF through. Use transparent mode and regular interfaces instead. I believe that stateful HA doesn't replicate connections created on inline-set interfaces, because those connections are tcp-state-bypass connections from Lina point of view. But upon failover Snort should be able to pickup flows midstream and traffic should not be interrupted. This document explains inline-set interfaces very well:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/firepower-ngfw/200924-configuring-firepower-threat-defense-int.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/firepower-ngfw/200924-configuring-firepower-threat-defense-int.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 20:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-with-inline-set/m-p/5140268#M1114022</guid>
      <dc:creator>tvotna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-04T20:23:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

