<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BGP MED Use Case in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5148273#M1114511</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Remember, MED is relevant when comparing routes from the same AS. If you want to consider MED across different ASes, use the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;always-compare-med&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;command. Pls confirm&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 13:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ganesh Devarshetty</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-22T13:11:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BGP MED Use Case</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5147779#M1114460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-left" image-alt="MED.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/223886iC23CF1FA79629D9E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MED.png" alt="MED.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can i use MED in above case to influence inbound traffic.R1 &amp;amp; R2 are advertising same prefixes to three different ISPs.Outbound traffic is influence by local preference.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 15:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5147779#M1114460</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ganesh Devarshetty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-21T15:54:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP MED Use Case</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5147788#M1114461</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This all your topolgy?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If yes then there is one link between each AS so no need MED at all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 16:20:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5147788#M1114461</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-21T16:20:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP MED Use Case</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5147817#M1114462</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1541641"&gt;@Ganesh Devarshetty&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Assuming ISP provide R1 and R2 are connected to ISP providers, using &lt;STRONG&gt;AS path&lt;/STRONG&gt; prepending can effectively influence inbound traffic in your network setup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By artificially lengthening the AS path attribute in BGP advertisements, you can make certain routes less attractive to your ISPs, thereby directing traffic to preferred entry points. For instance, if you want R1 to handle more traffic, you would prepend additional AS numbers to the advertisements from R2, making its path seem longer and less favorable. This method can help balance the load between R1 and R2 without upgrading your links.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The AS path is&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;one of the BGP attributes, it's a well-known mandatory attribute which means that it's included with all prefixes that are advertised through BGP&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;. When a BGP router advertises a prefix, it will include its own AS number to the left of the AS path attribute.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 19:43:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5147817#M1114462</guid>
      <dc:creator>M02@rt37</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-21T19:43:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP MED Use Case</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5148272#M1114510</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Remember, MED is relevant when comparing routes from the same AS. If you want to consider MED across different ASes, use the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;always-compare-med&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;command.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 13:10:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5148272#M1114510</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ganesh Devarshetty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-22T13:10:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP MED Use Case</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5148273#M1114511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Remember, MED is relevant when comparing routes from the same AS. If you want to consider MED across different ASes, use the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;always-compare-med&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;command. Pls confirm&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 13:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5148273#M1114511</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ganesh Devarshetty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-22T13:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP MED Use Case</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5148277#M1114512</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That true if AS-z and AS-B advertise same prefix&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then R4 and R5 can push MED to R1&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And R1 can config to use MED to prefer path to AS-Z or AS-B&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the topology ypu share &lt;STRONG&gt;NOT&lt;/STRONG&gt; mention that both AS z and b advertise or interconnect&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That why my answer is no need.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And it true you need&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Med always-compare&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since the R1 recieve MED from two different AS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 13:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-med-use-case/m-p/5148277#M1114512</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-22T13:17:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

