<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FTD Back-to-Back VXLAN in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-back-to-back-vxlan/m-p/5257836#M1119387</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I currently have 2 HA pairs of 4200 FTDs, 1 pair located in DC 1 and the other located in DC 2. The firewalls are used to terminate a number of VRFs that we operate within each data centre. All VRFs default to the local firewall. To avoid issues such as assymetric routing when routing inter-VRF traffic across sites, we need to he ability to connect the firewalls togther to ensure that ingress and agress traffic stays stateful.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have done this in the past using a dedicated transit VRF that all firewalls connect to, however I recently noticed that FTD now supports VXLAN tunnels when configured using FMC which will allow me to create a virtual connection between the firewalls which we can then use to pass inter-VRF, inter-site traffic. The topology will be similar to the one in the following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/secure-firewall-management-center/221043-configure-vxlan-interfaces-on-secure-ftd.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/secure-firewall-management-center/221043-configure-vxlan-interfaces-on-secure-ftd.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone set this up before and any issues or limitations to be aware of? Also can we use BGP across this in addition to static routing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>packet2020</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-07T00:46:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FTD Back-to-Back VXLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-back-to-back-vxlan/m-p/5257836#M1119387</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I currently have 2 HA pairs of 4200 FTDs, 1 pair located in DC 1 and the other located in DC 2. The firewalls are used to terminate a number of VRFs that we operate within each data centre. All VRFs default to the local firewall. To avoid issues such as assymetric routing when routing inter-VRF traffic across sites, we need to he ability to connect the firewalls togther to ensure that ingress and agress traffic stays stateful.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have done this in the past using a dedicated transit VRF that all firewalls connect to, however I recently noticed that FTD now supports VXLAN tunnels when configured using FMC which will allow me to create a virtual connection between the firewalls which we can then use to pass inter-VRF, inter-site traffic. The topology will be similar to the one in the following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/secure-firewall-management-center/221043-configure-vxlan-interfaces-on-secure-ftd.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/secure-firewall-management-center/221043-configure-vxlan-interfaces-on-secure-ftd.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone set this up before and any issues or limitations to be aware of? Also can we use BGP across this in addition to static routing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-back-to-back-vxlan/m-p/5257836#M1119387</guid>
      <dc:creator>packet2020</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-07T00:46:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

