<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CSCwo71835 - The NAS-IP-Address attribute is missing in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscwo71835-the-nas-ip-address-attribute-is-missing/m-p/5298833#M1121302</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The work around we were able to leverage was instead of using the NAS-IP-Address in the Radius policy set we used the Device-Access-IP-address which is still part of the Access-Request packet.&amp;nbsp; We left the NAS-IP-Add and used the OR statement. Once the bug is fixed we will revert back to using the NAS-IP only if recommended. We are using the ver. 7.7 of the FMC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MAP_2k_1-1749733167312.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/246403i1CB6D4B217AA4502/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MAP_2k_1-1749733167312.png" alt="MAP_2k_1-1749733167312.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 13:02:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MAP_2k</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-12T13:02:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSCwo71835 - The NAS-IP-Address attribute is missing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscwo71835-the-nas-ip-address-attribute-is-missing/m-p/5298833#M1121302</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The work around we were able to leverage was instead of using the NAS-IP-Address in the Radius policy set we used the Device-Access-IP-address which is still part of the Access-Request packet.&amp;nbsp; We left the NAS-IP-Add and used the OR statement. Once the bug is fixed we will revert back to using the NAS-IP only if recommended. We are using the ver. 7.7 of the FMC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MAP_2k_1-1749733167312.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/246403i1CB6D4B217AA4502/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MAP_2k_1-1749733167312.png" alt="MAP_2k_1-1749733167312.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 13:02:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscwo71835-the-nas-ip-address-attribute-is-missing/m-p/5298833#M1121302</guid>
      <dc:creator>MAP_2k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-12T13:02:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSCwo71835 - The NAS-IP-Address attribute is missing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscwo71835-the-nas-ip-address-attribute-is-missing/m-p/5301306#M1121382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can use Network device IP but in different authc policy match network device IP and protocol.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 14:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cscwo71835-the-nas-ip-address-attribute-is-missing/m-p/5301306#M1121382</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-21T14:10:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

