<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Failover query in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-query/m-p/5318750#M1122152</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So it will be disruption in network ? or link from active FTD to spare MX would not processed traffic and all traffic will go via active Ftd to active Mx ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 06:38:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vishal6</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-08T06:38:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failover query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-query/m-p/5318727#M1122150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm having one pair of Meraki Mx place as perimeter firewall and below one pair of FTD fw directly connected to Mx. Need to know how will be my failover works here as Meraki works as warmspare i.e failover would only happen if there's a connectivity loss with dashboard, while FTD support link, device, path failover.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MX1 single link to FTD1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MX2 single link to FTD2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just a thought if I do criss cross connectivity between Mx and FTD, would my Active FTD connected to both Mx's forward traffic to Spare Mx also and that traffic would be drop ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pls help&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 03:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-query/m-p/5318727#M1122150</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vishal6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-08T03:51:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-query/m-p/5318742#M1122151</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With warm-spare MX, if traffic hits the standby in a criss-cross setup, it’ll probably just get dropped since only the active one passes traffic until failover occurs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 05:58:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-query/m-p/5318742#M1122151</guid>
      <dc:creator>ZaynFow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-08T05:58:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-query/m-p/5318750#M1122152</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So it will be disruption in network ? or link from active FTD to spare MX would not processed traffic and all traffic will go via active Ftd to active Mx ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 06:38:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-query/m-p/5318750#M1122152</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vishal6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-08T06:38:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

