<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FTD Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-question/m-p/5371238#M1124513</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/97036"&gt;@Rob Ingram&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Yes its guest and is segregated, Is it best practice to have source and destination interfaces in the same security zone then.??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>N3om</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-19T13:34:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FTD Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-question/m-p/5371214#M1124510</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it ok to have two interfaces in different security zones in the same vrf, So traffic comes in on a sub-interface in security zone(visitors) then egresses through a RB VPN&amp;nbsp; VTI in security zone(guest-inet) is this ok or should i be doing it a different way??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 12:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-question/m-p/5371214#M1124510</guid>
      <dc:creator>N3om</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-19T12:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-question/m-p/5371215#M1124511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1726559"&gt;@N3om&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;yes, two interfaces in two different zones should be fine, even in the same vrf. I assume this vrf is for visitors/guest traffic and segmented from your normal corporate traffic, so that would be secure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 12:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-question/m-p/5371215#M1124511</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-19T12:23:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-question/m-p/5371238#M1124513</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/97036"&gt;@Rob Ingram&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Yes its guest and is segregated, Is it best practice to have source and destination interfaces in the same security zone then.??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-question/m-p/5371238#M1124513</guid>
      <dc:creator>N3om</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-19T13:34:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-question/m-p/5371240#M1124514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1726559"&gt;@N3om&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;no, I would recommend using different zones for each interface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:37:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-question/m-p/5371240#M1124514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-19T13:37:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

