<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FTD Route Based VPN Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545766#M1124962</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/97036"&gt;@Rob Ingram&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Ok thanks does the below look like a valid Nat exemption ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;111 (STAFF_INTERNET) to (any) source static STAFF-Network STAFF-Network&amp;nbsp; destination static any&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; -ipv4 any-ipv4&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:44:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>N3om</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-16T08:44:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FTD Route Based VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545757#M1124960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Can I add a Nat exemption rule after I have created a Route based VPN on FTD or do I need to select it when configuring the VPN ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:30:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545757#M1124960</guid>
      <dc:creator>N3om</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-16T08:30:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD Route Based VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545758#M1124961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1726559"&gt;@N3om&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;you can create the NAT exemption rule(s) after the VPN topology has been configured no problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:34:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545758#M1124961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-16T08:34:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD Route Based VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545766#M1124962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/97036"&gt;@Rob Ingram&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Ok thanks does the below look like a valid Nat exemption ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;111 (STAFF_INTERNET) to (any) source static STAFF-Network STAFF-Network&amp;nbsp; destination static any&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; -ipv4 any-ipv4&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:44:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545766#M1124962</guid>
      <dc:creator>N3om</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-16T08:44:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD Route Based VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545768#M1124963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1726559"&gt;@N3om&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;yes, but I would recommend not to use "any" as the destination interface and ideally not the destination networks either, be specific.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:47:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545768#M1124963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-16T08:47:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD Route Based VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545769#M1124964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;The destination Interface is a VTI which I dont think is supported in the NAT rule and the any Network is for Internet so cant do anything with that.?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545769#M1124964</guid>
      <dc:creator>N3om</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-16T08:51:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD Route Based VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545770#M1124965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1726559"&gt;@N3om&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;ok in that case, yes you are correct&amp;nbsp;you must use "any" as the interface; as you cannot explicitly specify interface names when using a VTI. In which case your NAT rule sohuld work and would just route traffic from "STAFF-Network" IP addresses over the VTI to any destination. I assume the upstream device would handle the NAT.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5545770#M1124965</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-16T08:56:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD Route Based VPN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5546225#M1124978</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1726559"&gt;@N3om&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;We usually do not need to do NAT exemption on VTI-based S2S VPN since the "normal" NAT rules don't apply to traffic to/from VTI interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 13:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-route-based-vpn-question/m-p/5546225#M1124978</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-17T13:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

