<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco firepower 2130p high usage cpu 100% &amp;amp; eventhandler termi in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-2130p-high-usage-cpu-100-amp-eventhandler/m-p/5548217#M1125089</link>
    <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would like to thank you for your answer, Mark Elsen.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We had already found the related post regarding bug 26815. However, the version running on our FP2130 is &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;9.18(4.205)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;, and according to the bug tracking tool, this version does not appear in either the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;affected versions list&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; or the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;fixed versions list&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Based on that information, we assumed that this bug does not apply to our current version.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So, could there be another explanation for this issue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 02:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>routeras</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-27T02:08:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco firepower 2130p high usage cpu 100% &amp; eventhandler terminated</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-2130p-high-usage-cpu-100-amp-eventhandler/m-p/5547867#M1125078</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello cisco community members,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an issue with 2 Cisco FP2130 firewalls. One is active and the other is standby, as expected. The problem is that the standby unit frequently shows 100% CPU usage, which would normally be expected on the active unit instead. Can you help identify what might be causing this? Would it help if I provided firmware versions or any other information?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the firmware is 7.2.10.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also we have noticed that there is a process webvpn timer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0x000000aaae1454c4 0x0000005559109d00 3.9% 4.0% 4.0% Webvpn Timer Process&lt;BR /&gt;- - 2.0% 1.4% 1.8% DATAPATH-4-1670&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on standby device. is it logical ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could the unexpected termination of the EventHandler process be the cause of the high CPU usage on the standby unit?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Furthermore , we see that there is a notification of an out date policy on the Standby device. I suspect that the notification appears when we get the notifications on the photo at the end of the message.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However there is no failover history as we can see.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your time and I will be waiting for your feedback so that we can hopefully find a solution that explains this notification.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="routeras_0-1776995008854.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/281011i84DD7FAACDFBA987/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="routeras_0-1776995008854.png" alt="routeras_0-1776995008854.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christos.B.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 01:44:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-2130p-high-usage-cpu-100-amp-eventhandler/m-p/5547867#M1125078</guid>
      <dc:creator>routeras</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-24T01:44:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco firepower 2130p high usage cpu 100% &amp; eventhandler termi</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-2130p-high-usage-cpu-100-amp-eventhandler/m-p/5547886#M1125079</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;-&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2069235"&gt;@routeras&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT color="#FF6600"&gt;&lt;EM&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;FYI :&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwp26815" target="_blank"&gt;https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwp26815&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 04:37:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-2130p-high-usage-cpu-100-amp-eventhandler/m-p/5547886#M1125079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-24T04:37:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco firepower 2130p high usage cpu 100% &amp; eventhandler termi</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-2130p-high-usage-cpu-100-amp-eventhandler/m-p/5548217#M1125089</link>
      <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would like to thank you for your answer, Mark Elsen.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We had already found the related post regarding bug 26815. However, the version running on our FP2130 is &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;9.18(4.205)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;, and according to the bug tracking tool, this version does not appear in either the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;affected versions list&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; or the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;fixed versions list&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Based on that information, we assumed that this bug does not apply to our current version.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So, could there be another explanation for this issue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 02:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-2130p-high-usage-cpu-100-amp-eventhandler/m-p/5548217#M1125089</guid>
      <dc:creator>routeras</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-27T02:08:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco firepower 2130p high usage cpu 100% &amp; eventhandler termi</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-2130p-high-usage-cpu-100-amp-eventhandler/m-p/5548231#M1125090</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2069235"&gt;@routeras&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I suspect the bug is applicable to your version also&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 04:55:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-firepower-2130p-high-usage-cpu-100-amp-eventhandler/m-p/5548231#M1125090</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-27T04:55:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

