<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876236#M128599</link>
    <description>In fxos, did you set the port type to data for the port channel?&lt;BR /&gt;set port-type data&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, on the fxos what is output from show port-channel?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;scope eth-uplink&lt;BR /&gt;scope fabric a&lt;BR /&gt;show port-channel</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:53:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-19T17:53:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876008#M128577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am having issues creating an Trunked Etherchannel between a switch and an ASA firepower 4120.&amp;nbsp; I have an etherchannel up that is an access etherchannel and it works fine, the problem comes when I try to trunk it.&amp;nbsp; I have tried a non-etherchannel trunk port and it works too.&amp;nbsp; This is my first setup of a firepower device with the ASA software, so I was wondering if anyone else has experience or knowledge of why this will not work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The configs seem pretty straight forward, but I may have missed something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the switch I have the interfaces configured like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/5&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk native vlan 100&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk allowed vlan 180&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;switchport nonegotiate&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group 1 mode active&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast disable&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree bpduguard disable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!port channel like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Port-channel1&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk native vlan 100&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk allowed vlan 180&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;switchport nonegotiate&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast disable&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree bpduguard disable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;___________________________&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on the Firepower Chassis manager I bundled two ports into an etherchannel and set them to enable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on the ASA software, I did the following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Port-channel2&lt;BR /&gt;no nameif&lt;BR /&gt;no security-level&lt;BR /&gt;no ip address&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Port-channel2.180&lt;BR /&gt;vlan 180&lt;BR /&gt;nameif outside&lt;BR /&gt;security-level 0&lt;BR /&gt;ip address x.x.x.x m.m.m.m&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;______________________________&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on the switch, after a no shut, I get the following error and the Etherchannel does not start:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Port-channel1, changed state to down&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/5, changed state to up&lt;BR /&gt;%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/6, changed state to up&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;%ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Te1/1/5 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;%ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Te1/1/6 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas on what has been missed, or what could be causing the issue?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876008#M128577</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Green</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T12:39:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876019#M128580</link>
      <description>Looking at the Output it seems one end of the Port-Channel (switch) is set to LACP (Active). The other end (ASA / Firepower) may have defaulted to "On" meaning the ether channel won't form.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a test you could amend the switch end to "on" rather than active and force it up. Or preferably double check the ASA end and ensure it is at least set to understand LACP.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876019#M128580</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T13:05:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876045#M128586</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have set the switch to on and the switch side comes up, but not the ASA/Firepower side.&amp;nbsp; I read in documentation that FXOS requires LACP.&amp;nbsp; The access port etherchannel that I have currently would not come up until I made it "active" instead of "on".&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do I make sure the ASA (or maybe even FXOS) understands LACP?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:40:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876045#M128586</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Green</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T13:40:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876076#M128589</link>
      <description>Yeah it looks like your chassis only supports LACP Active.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Looking at the documentation -&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"When the Firepower 4100/9300 chassis creates an EtherChannel, the EtherChannel stays in a Suspended&lt;BR /&gt;state until you assign it to a logical device, even if the physical link is up.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:14:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876076#M128589</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T14:14:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876122#M128592</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The physical link is up and the channel-group is set to active and it is also associated to a logical device (ASA), however it is still appearing down.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:03:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876122#M128592</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Green</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T15:03:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876179#M128594</link>
      <description>On the ASA cli itself have you configured the following for your port channel?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group channel_id mode active&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876179#M128594</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T16:19:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876208#M128597</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have not.&amp;nbsp; the CLI of the ASA does not show the interfaces that are associated with the PortChannel, only the portchannel itself since the Portchannel is configured from the chasis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show int | i Interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface Port-channel2 "", is down, line protocol is down&lt;BR /&gt;Interface Port-channel2.180 "outside", is down, line protocol is down&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:02:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876208#M128597</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Green</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T17:02:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876236#M128599</link>
      <description>In fxos, did you set the port type to data for the port channel?&lt;BR /&gt;set port-type data&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, on the fxos what is output from show port-channel?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;scope eth-uplink&lt;BR /&gt;scope fabric a&lt;BR /&gt;show port-channel</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:53:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876236#M128599</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T17:53:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876272#M128600</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, it is set to type Data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show port-channel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Port Channel:&lt;BR /&gt;Port Channel Id Name Port Type Admin State Oper State State Reason&lt;BR /&gt;--------------- ---------------- ------------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------&lt;BR /&gt;2 Port-channel2 Data Enabled Failed No operational members&lt;BR /&gt;48 Port-channel48 Cluster Disabled Admin Down Administratively down&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876272#M128600</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Green</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T19:04:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876284#M128601</link>
      <description>Has the ASA service module been rebooted since the ports were assigned to it and port channel created?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3876284#M128601</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T19:50:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3877580#M128602</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Grant,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Thank you very much for looking at this form me.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found that etherchannels in the code I was using were not stable.&amp;nbsp; I ended up updating FXOS from 2.2.2.17 to 2.4.1.214 and ASA from 9.8.2 to 9.8.4.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This allowed me to go from an "active" LACP state to an "on" state in the etherchannel from the FCM, and everything came up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 17:42:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3877580#M128602</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Green</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T17:42:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunked Etherchannel between switch and Firepower 4120</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3877621#M128603</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Brian,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the update. Always good to find out what the fix was to help others who might come across funny ones like this. Glad it's all working.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 19:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunked-etherchannel-between-switch-and-firepower-4120/m-p/3877621#M128603</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T19:00:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

