<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FTD access policy unexpected beheviour after applying a rule to block Teamviewer Application. in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-access-policy-unexpected-beheviour-after-applying-a-rule-to/m-p/3889243#M132497</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The default action is se to block all. See image. A default action set to other must add: permit ip any any (without zones).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note the rule blocking the Application (Teamviewer in this case) is adding the permit action.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a workaround I am looking to define a specific protocol in the same rule (for example icmp echo) and it is working (it adds only icmp echo). But this is a rare the behaviour, don´t think so ?&amp;nbsp; There must be a better way to tune this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RULES.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/40697i68493BDAA886CC7E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="RULES.png" alt="RULES.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mrodriguezm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-12T13:33:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FTD access policy unexpected beheviour after applying a rule to block Teamviewer Application.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-access-policy-unexpected-beheviour-after-applying-a-rule-to/m-p/3888068#M132492</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, experts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;After applying in the FTD a rule to block the Teamviewer application for the internal hosts to internet (INSIDE to OUTSIDE),&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;I found in LINA this:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;FTD-5516X-XXX# show access-list CSM_FW_ACL_ | i 268434489&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;access-list CSM_FW_ACL_ line 219 remark rule-id 268434489: ACCESS POLICY: ACP-XXX - Mandatory&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;access-list CSM_FW_ACL_ line 220 remark rule-id 268434489: L7 RULE: BLOCK TEAM VIEWER&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;access-list CSM_FW_ACL_ line 221 advanced permit ip ifc INSIDE any ifc OUTSIDE any rule-id 268434489 (hitcnt=514521) 0x38d32427&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;The application has been blocked but is allowing everything from INSIDE to OUTSIDE (when application is not matching).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;Is normal this behaviour or what can I do to avoid that rule not allow the traffic in line 221 ?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;Regards.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 01:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-access-policy-unexpected-beheviour-after-applying-a-rule-to/m-p/3888068#M132492</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrodriguezm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-11T01:34:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD access policy unexpected beheviour after applying a rule to block Teamviewer Application.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-access-policy-unexpected-beheviour-after-applying-a-rule-to/m-p/3889152#M132494</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the default action of the policy? (shown here in my firepower management center)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should be set to "Block", I think yours might be "allow"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="default action fmc.JPG" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/40691i316EF28503389AA7/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="default action fmc.JPG" alt="default action fmc.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-access-policy-unexpected-beheviour-after-applying-a-rule-to/m-p/3889152#M132494</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhmservice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-12T11:45:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD access policy unexpected beheviour after applying a rule to block Teamviewer Application.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-access-policy-unexpected-beheviour-after-applying-a-rule-to/m-p/3889243#M132497</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The default action is se to block all. See image. A default action set to other must add: permit ip any any (without zones).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note the rule blocking the Application (Teamviewer in this case) is adding the permit action.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a workaround I am looking to define a specific protocol in the same rule (for example icmp echo) and it is working (it adds only icmp echo). But this is a rare the behaviour, don´t think so ?&amp;nbsp; There must be a better way to tune this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RULES.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/40697i68493BDAA886CC7E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="RULES.png" alt="RULES.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-access-policy-unexpected-beheviour-after-applying-a-rule-to/m-p/3889243#M132497</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrodriguezm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-12T13:33:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

